These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31273125)

  • 1. The magnitude of small-study effects in the
    Lin L; Shi L; Chu H; Murad MH
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 25(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 31273125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. P value-driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Xu C; Lin L; Doan T; Chu H; Thalib L; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():86-92. PubMed ID: 31743750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
    Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
    Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
    Sutton AJ; Duval SJ; Tweedie RL; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1574-7. PubMed ID: 10845965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of publication bias in the gastroenterology literature.
    Heavener T; Vassar M
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 37(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29488081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias.
    Hayashino Y; Noguchi Y; Fukui T
    J Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 15(6):235-43. PubMed ID: 16276033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects.
    Papageorgiou SN; Tsiranidou E; Antonoglou GN; Deschner J; Jäger A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 25666885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Schwab S; Kreiliger G; Held L
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045942. PubMed ID: 34521659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of publication bias magnitude and direction on the certainty in evidence.
    Murad MH; Chu H; Lin L; Wang Z
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Jun; 23(3):84-86. PubMed ID: 29650725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.