These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31273775)

  • 41. Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits.
    Nelson AC; Colson KE; Harmon S; Potts WK
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 13():81. PubMed ID: 23577674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The consequences of sexual selection in well-adapted and maladapted populations of bean beetles†.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Savković U; Đorđević M; Arnqvist G; Stojković B; Berger D
    Evolution; 2018 Mar; 72(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 29238970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sexual selection and mate limitation shape evolution of species' range limits.
    Tschol M; Reid JM; Bocedi G
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):951-963. PubMed ID: 38416475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multivariate intralocus sexual conflict in seed beetles.
    Berger D; Berg EC; Widegren W; Arnqvist G; Maklakov AA
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3457-69. PubMed ID: 25213393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria.
    Martin OY; Hosken DJ; Ward PI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271(1537):353-9. PubMed ID: 15101693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.
    Holland B; Rice WR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(9):5083-8. PubMed ID: 10220422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness.
    Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Selection for costly sexual traits results in a vacant mating niche and male dimorphism.
    Hendrickx F; Vanthournout B; Taborsky M
    Evolution; 2015 Aug; 69(8):2105-17. PubMed ID: 26179673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.
    Grieshop K; Berger D; Arnqvist G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28606137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Direct and indirect effects of male genital elaboration in female seed beetles.
    Arnqvist G; Grieshop K; Hotzy C; Rönn J; Polak M; Rowe L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1954):20211068. PubMed ID: 34229496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Male-biased sex ratio does not promote increased sperm competitiveness in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus.
    McNamara KB; Robinson SP; Rosa ME; Sloan NS; van Lieshout E; Simmons LW
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28153. PubMed ID: 27306351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.
    Yun L; Chen PJ; Kwok KE; Angell CS; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jun; 115(26):6762-6767. PubMed ID: 29891650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.
    Colpitts J; Williscroft D; Sekhon HS; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29021319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can Sexual Selection Drive the Evolution of Sperm Cell Structure?
    Simmons LW; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Cells; 2021 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 34067752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Metapopulation structure modulates sexual antagonism.
    Rodriguez-Exposito E; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Evol Lett; 2021 Aug; 5(4):344-358. PubMed ID: 34367660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.