BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31275660)

  • 21. Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: Standard vs. line-to-line cementation techniques. A biomechanical in-vitro study involving six osteoporotic pairs of human cadaver femurs.
    Kutzner KP; Freitag T; Bieger R; Reichel H; Pfeil J; Ignatius A; Dürselen L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Feb; 52():86-94. PubMed ID: 29407863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric derotational osteotomy for severe femoral anteversion.
    Zadeh HG; Hua J; Walker PS; Muirhead-Allwood SK
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Sep; 14(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 10512440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Confrontation of the radiographic preoperative planning with the postoperative data for uncemented total hip arthroplasty].
    Debarge R; Lustig S; Neyret P; Ait Si Selmi T
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 18555863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement.
    Pipino F; Molfetta L
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1993; 19(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8567257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.
    Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lecoz L; Flecher X; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23806349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Use of the anatomical cemented femoral stem SAS I: mid-term results].
    Mikláš M; Pink M; Valoušek T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 26317186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The History of Biomechanics in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Houcke JV; Khanduja V; Pattyn C; Audenaert E
    Indian J Orthop; 2017; 51(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 28790464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fixation of non-cemented total hip arthroplasty femoral components in a simulated proximal bone defect model.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Knutsen AR; Borkowski SL; Kalma JJ; Bengs BC
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1618-24. PubMed ID: 23523487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of dynamic hip motion on the micromotion of press-fit acetabular cups in six degrees of freedom.
    Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Aug; 38(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 27210567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduced Thigh Pain with Short Femoral Stem Design Following Direct Anterior Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Horwood NJ; Nam D; Greco NJ; Lombardi AV; Clohisy JC; Lawrie CM; Berend KR
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():437-444. PubMed ID: 31037711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the fit and geometry of reconstruction of femoral components of four cemented canine total hip replacement implants.
    Schulz KS; Nielsen C; Stover SM; Kass PH
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Sep; 61(9):1113-21. PubMed ID: 10976745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polished Cemented Femoral Stems Have a Lower Rate of Revision Than Matt Finished Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 96,315 Cemented Femoral Stems.
    Hoskins W; van Bavel D; Lorimer M; de Steiger RN
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1472-1476. PubMed ID: 29310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
    Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
    Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.