These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31276029)

  • 21. The Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET): design and general baseline characteristics.
    Hyman L; Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle WL; Norton TT; Hussein M;
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Oct; 22(5):573-92. PubMed ID: 11578789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual acuity testing using autorefraction or pinhole occluder compared with a manual protocol refraction in individuals with diabetes.
    Sun JK; Aiello LP; Cavallerano JD; Stockman M; Miller KM; Qin H; Beck RW; Glassman AR;
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Mar; 118(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 20947171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power maps and wavefront for progressive addition lenses in eyeglass frames.
    Mejía Y; Mora DA; Díaz DE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1259-70. PubMed ID: 25105689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among Native American grade school children.
    Harvey EM; Dobson V; Miller JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 16614575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading.
    Pappas CJ; Anderson DR; Briese FW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1978 Jun; 96(6):997-8. PubMed ID: 655949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects.
    Hazel CA; Cox MJ; Strang NC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 80(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 12597330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
    Bamdad S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Abdolahian M; Piñero DP
    J Optom; 2022; 15(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32896507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of eye rotation and contact lens decentration on horizontal peripheral refraction.
    Jaisankar D; Leube A; Gifford KL; Schmid KL; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Sep; 39(5):370-377. PubMed ID: 31482609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.
    Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T
    Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
    Plum W; Varadaraj V; Dosto N; Thompson SL; Gajwani P; Friedman DS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual acuity screening versus noncycloplegic autorefraction screening for astigmatism in Native American preschool children.
    Miller JM; Harvey EM; Dobson V
    J AAPOS; 1999 Jun; 3(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 10428590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trial frame refraction versus autorefraction among new patients in a low-vision clinic.
    DeCarlo DK; McGwin G; Searcey K; Gao L; Snow M; Waterbor J; Owsley C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 23188726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
    Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peripheral Refraction Validity of the Shin-Nippon SRW5000 Autorefractor.
    Osuagwu UL; Suheimat M; Wolffsohn JS; Atchison DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1254-61. PubMed ID: 27536977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optical treatment of amblyopia in astigmatic children: the sensitive period for successful treatment.
    Harvey EM; Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2293-301. PubMed ID: 18054643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.