137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31276391)
1. CoDockPP: A Multistage Approach for Global and Site-Specific Protein-Protein Docking.
Kong R; Wang F; Zhang J; Wang F; Chang S
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3556-3564. PubMed ID: 31276391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking.
Yan Y; Huang SY
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):696. PubMed ID: 31874620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring protein-protein interactions using the site-identification by ligand competitive saturation methodology.
Yu W; Jo S; Lakkaraju SK; Weber DJ; MacKerell AD
Proteins; 2019 Apr; 87(4):289-301. PubMed ID: 30582220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein docking by Rotation-Based Uniform Sampling (RotBUS) with fast computing of intermolecular contact distance and residue desolvation.
Solernou A; Fernandez-Recio J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():352. PubMed ID: 20584304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Docking server for the identification of heparin binding sites on proteins.
Mottarella SE; Beglov D; Beglova N; Nugent MA; Kozakov D; Vajda S
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2068-78. PubMed ID: 24974889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SDOCK: a global protein-protein docking program using stepwise force-field potentials.
Zhang C; Lai L
J Comput Chem; 2011 Sep; 32(12):2598-612. PubMed ID: 21618559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PEPSI-Dock: a detailed data-driven protein-protein interaction potential accelerated by polar Fourier correlation.
Neveu E; Ritchie DW; Popov P; Grudinin S
Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):i693-i701. PubMed ID: 27587691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accounting for pairwise distance restraints in FFT-based protein-protein docking.
Xia B; Vajda S; Kozakov D
Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(21):3342-3344. PubMed ID: 27357172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FitDock: protein-ligand docking by template fitting.
Yang X; Liu Y; Gan J; Xiao ZX; Cao Y
Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking.
Desta IT; Porter KA; Xia B; Kozakov D; Vajda S
Structure; 2020 Sep; 28(9):1071-1081.e3. PubMed ID: 32649857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions.
Ritchie DW; Kozakov D; Vajda S
Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(17):1865-73. PubMed ID: 18591193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of Desolvation Energy into Protein-Protein Docking through Atomic Contact Potentials.
Li H; Yan Y; Zhao X; Huang SY
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 35068149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of combined strategies for improving the performance of molecular docking.
Xu S; Wang L; Pan X
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2021 Apr; 19(2):2150003. PubMed ID: 33641636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
