These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31276769)

  • 21. [Equivalent dose and efficient dose in risk assessment of stochastic effects in diagnostic radiology].
    Bistolfi F
    Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):85-9. PubMed ID: 10566301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Circulatory disease in French nuclear fuel cycle workers chronically exposed to uranium: a nested case-control study.
    Zhivin S; Guseva Canu I; Davesne E; Blanchardon E; Garsi JP; Samson E; Niogret C; Zablotska LB; Laurier D
    Occup Environ Med; 2018 Apr; 75(4):270-276. PubMed ID: 29089390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiological risk assessment of Capstone depleted uranium aerosols.
    Hahn FF; Roszell LE; Daxon EG; Guilmette RA; Parkhurst MA
    Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 19204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of particle size distribution on inhalation doses to workers in the Florida phosphate industry.
    Kim KP; Wu CY; Birky BK; Bolch WE
    Health Phys; 2006 Jul; 91(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 16775481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characterisation and dissolution of depleted uranium aerosols produced during impacts of kinetic energy penetrators against a tank.
    Chazel V; Gerasimo P; Dabouis V; Laroche P; Paquet F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):163-6. PubMed ID: 14526949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the risk of radiation exposure from new 18FDG PET/CT plans versus conventional X-ray plans in patients with pediatric cancers.
    Murano T; Tateishi U; Iinuma T; Shimada N; Daisaki H; Terauchi T; Moriyama N; Inoue T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2010 May; 24(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 20237874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. USTUR case 0259 whole body donation: a comprehensive test of the current ICRP models for the behavior of inhaled 238PuO2 ceramic particles. U.S. Transuranium and Uranium Registries.
    James AC; Filipy RE; Russell JJ; McInroy JF
    Health Phys; 2003 Jan; 84(1):2-33. PubMed ID: 12498515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Bayesian analysis of uncertainties on lung doses resulting from occupational exposures to uranium.
    Puncher M; Birchall A; Bull RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 23528329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Occupational Contamination with a Highly Enriched Uranium Solution.
    Mullinax RA; Iddins BO; Alday MA; McLaughlin DA
    Health Phys; 2020 Sep; 119(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 32301861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Novel weight-based dose threshold for 18F-NaF PET-CT imaging using advanced PET-CT systems: a potential tool for reducing radiation burden.
    Marafi F; Esmail A; Rasheed R; Alkandari F; Usmani S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Sep; 38(9):764-770. PubMed ID: 28723715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reliability of dose coefficients for inhalation and ingestion of uranium by members of the public.
    Puncher M; Burt G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 23704361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A compartmental model of uranium in human hair for protracted ingestion of natural uranium in drinking water.
    Li WB; Karpas Z; Salonen L; Kurttio P; Muikku M; Wahl W; Höllriegl V; Hoeschen C; Oeh U
    Health Phys; 2009 Jun; 96(6):636-45. PubMed ID: 19430216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Overview of ICRP Committee 2: doses from radiation exposure.
    Harrison JD; Paquet F
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Jun; 45(1 Suppl):17-24. PubMed ID: 26984902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks.
    Mattsson S; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):17-21. PubMed ID: 25802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Further evaluations of the toxicity of irradiated advanced heavy water reactor fuels.
    Edwards GW; Priest ND
    Health Phys; 2014 Nov; 107(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 25271932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calculated organ doses using Monte Carlo simulations in a reference male phantom undergoing HDR brachytherapy applied to localized prostate carcinoma.
    Candela-Juan C; Perez-Calatayud J; Ballester F; Rivard MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):033901. PubMed ID: 23464344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiation dose assessment of exposure to depleted uranium.
    Li WB; Gerstmann UC; Höllriegl V; Szymczak W; Roth P; Hoeschen C; Oeh U
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 19(5):502-14. PubMed ID: 18596688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective dose scaling factors for use with uranium series cascade impactor data: a reassessment using the IMBA code.
    Kim KP; Wu CY; Birky BK; Bolch WE
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16966876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The ICRP protection quantities, equivalent and effective dose: their basis and application.
    Harrison JD; Streffer C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):12-8. PubMed ID: 18003712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.