191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31277824)
1. How Does Option Value Affect the Potential Cost-Effectiveness of a Treatment? The Case of Ipilimumab for Metastatic Melanoma.
Li M; Basu A; Bennette C; Veenstra D; Garrison LP
Value Health; 2019 Jul; 22(7):777-784. PubMed ID: 31277824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cohort versus patient level simulation for the economic evaluation of single versus combination immuno-oncology therapies in metastatic melanoma.
Gibson EJ; Begum N; Koblbauer I; Dranitsaris G; Liew D; McEwan P; Yuan Y; Juarez-Garcia A; Tyas D; Pritchard C
J Med Econ; 2019 Jun; 22(6):531-544. PubMed ID: 30638416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic Evaluation of Talimogene Laherparepvec Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy vs Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma.
Almutairi AR; Alkhatib NS; Oh M; Curiel-Lewandrowski C; Babiker HM; Cranmer LD; McBride A; Abraham I
JAMA Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 155(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30477000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England.
Meng Y; Hertel N; Ellis J; Morais E; Johnson H; Philips Z; Roskell N; Walker A; Lee D
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1163-1172. PubMed ID: 29524005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ipilimumab in 2nd line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Barzey V; Atkins MB; Garrison LP; Asukai Y; Kotapati S; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 23057750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frontline BRAF Testing-Guided Treatment for Advanced Melanoma in the Era of Immunotherapies: A Cost-Utility Analysis Based on Long-term Survival Data.
Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 156(11):1177-1184. PubMed ID: 32697281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab versus high-dose interferon as an adjuvant therapy in resected high-risk melanoma.
Salans M; Courtney PT; Yip A; Murphy JD
Cancer Med; 2021 Oct; 10(19):6618-6626. PubMed ID: 34402192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accounting for Cured Patients in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Othus M; Bansal A; Koepl L; Wagner S; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):705-709. PubMed ID: 28408015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Compared with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma in Australia.
Bohensky MA; Pasupathi K; Gorelik A; Kim H; Harrison JP; Liew D
Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):1009-1015. PubMed ID: 27987627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Wan X; Zhang Y; Tan C; Zeng X; Peng L
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Apr; 5(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 30789633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy Compared with Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the United States.
Oh A; Tran DM; McDowell LC; Keyvani D; Barcelon JA; Merino O; Wilson L
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jun; 23(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 28530525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma Treatment in Portugal.
Miguel LS; Lopes FV; Pinheiro B; Wang J; Xu R; Pellissier J; Laires PA
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 28964438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chu JN; Choi J; Ostvar S; Torchia JA; Reynolds KL; Tramontano A; Gainor JF; Chung DC; Clark JW; Hur C
Cancer; 2019 Jan; 125(2):278-289. PubMed ID: 30343509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ipilimumab prolongs survival in advanced melanoma.
Burki TK
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Nov; 17(11):e481. PubMed ID: 27746107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Option Value of Innovative Treatments for Metastatic Melanoma.
Thornton Snider J; Seabury S; Tebeka MG; Wu Y; Batt K
Forum Health Econ Policy; 2018 Jun; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 30210050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early cost-effectiveness of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for second line treatment in advanced melanoma: a model-based economic evaluation.
Retèl VP; Steuten LMG; Geukes Foppen MH; Mewes JC; Lindenberg MA; Haanen JBAG; van Harten WH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Sep; 18(1):895. PubMed ID: 30219040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Ipilimumab-Naïve Patients with Advanced Melanoma in the United States.
Wang J; Chmielowski B; Pellissier J; Xu R; Stevinson K; Liu FX
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 28125365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Vs Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
Watson TR; Gao X; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2016144. PubMed ID: 33052401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequential treatment approaches in the management of BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Tarhini A; Benedict A; McDermott D; Rao S; Ambavane A; Gupte-Singh K; Sabater J; Ritchings C; Aponte-Ribero V; Regan MM; Atkins M
Immunotherapy; 2018 Oct; 10(14):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 30175642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ipilimumab for Previously Untreated Unresectable Malignant Melanoma: A Critique of the Evidence.
Giannopoulou C; Sideris E; Wade R; Moe-Byrne T; Eastwood A; McKenna C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1269-79. PubMed ID: 26043718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
