These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31277873)

  • 1. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Frequency spectra and filtering of the early auditory evoked potential].
    Tietze G; Kevanishvili Z
    HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):399-407. PubMed ID: 2289897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).
    Møller AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 2451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal digital filters for analyzing the mid-latency auditory P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Liljander S; Holm A; Keski-Säntti P; Partanen JV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():50-67. PubMed ID: 27015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of notch filtering on the waveform of the newborn auditory brainstem response.
    Lightfoot G; Ferm I; Hall A; Evans K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 24673661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses.
    Møller AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1980 Nov; 1(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7457758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analog delay line artifact rejector for evoked potential studies.
    Pratt H; Rogowski Z; Bental E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 May; 53(5):565-67. PubMed ID: 6177501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of methods for reducing residual noise in suprathreshold early auditory evoked potential registration].
    Mühler R; von Specht H; Pethe J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jul; 77(7):382-7. PubMed ID: 9743976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of some nonrecursive digital filters for signals of auditory evoked responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M; Johansson R
    Biol Cybern; 1992; 66(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1586677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of finite impulse response digital filters to auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Urbach D; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 64(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 2427321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise.
    McEvoy LK; Picton TW; Champagne SC; Kellett AJ; Kelly JB
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):163-80. PubMed ID: 2383215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.