These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31277878)

  • 21. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Localization of abnormal discharges causing insular epilepsy by magnetoencephalography.
    Park HM; Nakasato N; Tominaga T
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2012 Mar; 226(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 22353789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [High-resolution EEG (HR-EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG)].
    Gavaret M; Badier JM; Chauvel P
    Neurochirurgie; 2008 May; 54(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18417162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal design of on-scalp electromagnetic sensor arrays for brain source localisation.
    Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Eichardt R; Haueisen J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(15):4869-4879. PubMed ID: 34245061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-subject MEG/EEG source imaging with sparse multi-task regression.
    Janati H; Bazeille T; Thirion B; Cuturi M; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():116847. PubMed ID: 32438046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).
    Hari R; Baillet S; Barnes G; Burgess R; Forss N; Gross J; Hämäläinen M; Jensen O; Kakigi R; Mauguière F; Nakasato N; Puce A; Romani GL; Schnitzler A; Taulu S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Aug; 129(8):1720-1747. PubMed ID: 29724661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    George JS; Aine CJ; Mosher JC; Schmidt DM; Ranken DM; Schlitt HA; Wood CC; Lewine JD; Sanders JA; Belliveau JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):406-31. PubMed ID: 8576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.