BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31278544)

  • 1. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bubenek-Turconi ŞI; Hendy A; Băilă S; Drăgan A; Chioncel O; Văleanu L; Moroșanu B; Iliescu VA
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Jun; 34(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 31278544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transesophageal Echocardiographic Measurements of the Superior Vena Cava for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation.
    Cheng Z; Yang QQ; Zhu P; Feng JY; Zhang XB; Zhao ZB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1519-1525. PubMed ID: 30298577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fluid responsiveness with dynamic superior vena cava collapsibility index in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Li Y; Jiang L; Wang L; Dou D; Feng Y
    Perioper Med (Lond); 2023 Apr; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 37038231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Echocardiographic Indices Used to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients.
    Vignon P; Repessé X; Bégot E; Léger J; Jacob C; Bouferrache K; Slama M; Prat G; Vieillard-Baron A
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2017 Apr; 195(8):1022-1032. PubMed ID: 27653798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters.
    Charbonneau H; Riu B; Faron M; Mari A; Kurrek MM; Ruiz J; Geeraerts T; Fourcade O; Genestal M; Silva S
    Crit Care; 2014 Sep; 18(5):473. PubMed ID: 25189403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients With Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure.
    Preau S; Bortolotti P; Colling D; Dewavrin F; Colas V; Voisin B; Onimus T; Drumez E; Durocher A; Redheuil A; Saulnier F
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):e290-e297. PubMed ID: 27749318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study.
    Lan H; Zhou X; Xue J; Liu B; Chen G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):165. PubMed ID: 29202703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy.
    Davies SJ; Minhas S; Wilson RJ; Yates D; Howell SJ
    J Clin Anesth; 2013 Sep; 25(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 23965199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonographic measurements of the inferior vena cava variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing anesthesia for surgery.
    Zhang X; Feng J; Zhu P; Luan H; Wu Y; Zhao Z
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 204(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 27451877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery.
    Ma Q; Ji J; Shi X; Lu Z; Xu L; Hao J; Zhu W; Li B
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 May; 22(1):150. PubMed ID: 35581547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively.
    Lahner D; Kabon B; Marschalek C; Chiari A; Pestel G; Kaider A; Fleischmann E; Hetz H
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 103(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 19628484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis.
    Theerawit P; Morasert T; Sutherasan Y
    J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():246-251. PubMed ID: 27591389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study.
    Machare-Delgado E; Decaro M; Marik PE
    J Intensive Care Med; 2011; 26(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 21595098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation].
    Guo Z; He W; Hou J; Li T; Zhou H; Xu Y; Xi X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Sep; 26(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 25230862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility and central venous pressure.
    Cowie BS; Kluger R; Rex S; Missant C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2015 May; 43(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 25943610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
    Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
    Lu N; Xi X; Jiang L; Yang D; Yin K
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1258-1261. PubMed ID: 28363617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions.
    Reuter DA; Goepfert MS; Goresch T; Schmoeckel M; Kilger E; Goetz AE
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15591333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.
    Lanspa MJ; Grissom CK; Hirshberg EL; Jones JP; Brown SM
    Shock; 2013 Feb; 39(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 23324885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.