These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31278572)

  • 1. Correction to: An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Given-Wilson RM; Cohen SL; Patnick J; Alison RJ; Wallis MG
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):7074-7075. PubMed ID: 31278572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction to: Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography.
    Lameijer JRC; Coolen AM; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MWJ; Venderink D; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LEM
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):1059. PubMed ID: 29943179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction to: CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of three baseline screening protocols.
    Henschke CI; Yip R; Ma T; Aguayo SM; Zulueta J; Yankelevitz DF;
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3321-3322. PubMed ID: 30715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening organization and recall rate in a regional breast screening programme.
    Beruchashwili T; Gvamichava R; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2018 Mar; 25(1):55-56. PubMed ID: 28614990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction to: Toward clinically usable CAD for lung cancer screening with computed tomography.
    Brown MS; Lo P; Goldin JG; Barnoy E; Kim GHJ; McNitt-Gray MF; Aberle DR
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1822. PubMed ID: 31728683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction to: People with diabetes do not learn and recall their diabetes foot education: a cohort study.
    Yuncken J; Williams CM; Stolwyk RJ; Haines TP
    Endocrine; 2019 Mar; 63(3):660. PubMed ID: 30506359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction to: The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.
    Dufour AB; Roberts B; Broe KE; Kiel DP; Bouxsein ML; Hannan MT
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1897. PubMed ID: 31263920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates.
    Blanks RG; Bennett RL; Patnick J; Cush S; Davison C; Moss SM
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 16038694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction to: Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.
    Pourvaziri A; Parakh A; Mojtahed A; Kambadakone A; Sahani DV
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):7080. PubMed ID: 31297630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction to: A quantitative model based on clinically relevant MRI features differentiates lower grade gliomas and glioblastoma.
    Cao H; Erson-Omay EZ; Li X; Günel M; Moliterno J; Fulbright RK
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4145. PubMed ID: 32152743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000-05.
    Bennett RL; Blanks RG; Patnick J; Moss SM
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 18078565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction to: Baseline and annual repeat rounds of screening: implications for optimal regimens of screening.
    Henschke CI; Salvatore M; Cham M; Powell CA; DiFabrizio L; Flores R; Kaufman A; Eber C; Yip R; Yankelevitz DF;
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3114. PubMed ID: 29442132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction to: Evaluating the Effect of a Video Education Curriculum for First Time Breast Cancer Patients: a Prospective RCT Feasibility Study.
    Sulakvelidze N; Burdick B; Gelfand E; Kaklamani V; Tilton K; Baker K; Kim J; Javid S; Gralow JR
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Dec; 34(6):1241. PubMed ID: 31650489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction to: Design and validation of an osteochondral bioreactor for the screening of treatments for osteoarthritis.
    Nichols DA; Sondh IS; Little SR; Zunino P; Gottardi R
    Biomed Microdevices; 2018 May; 20(2):39. PubMed ID: 29736756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The calculation of targets for the cancer and adenoma detection rates for the NHS bowel screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM
    J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 22569075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction to: A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.
    Berian JR; Cuddy A; Francescatti AB; O'Dwyer L; Nancy You Y; Volk RJ; Chang GJ
    J Cancer Surviv; 2018 Oct; 12(5):721. PubMed ID: 29951829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.