BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31278577)

  • 1. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
    Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography, Transient Elastography, and MR Elastography for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Furlan A; Tublin ME; Yu L; Chopra KB; Lippello A; Behari J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):W20-W26. PubMed ID: 31714842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Point shear wave elastography method for assessing liver stiffness.
    Ferraioli G; Tinelli C; Lissandrin R; Zicchetti M; Dal Bello B; Filice G; Filice C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 20(16):4787-96. PubMed ID: 24782633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic Resonance Elastography vs Transient Elastography in Detection of Fibrosis and Noninvasive Measurement of Steatosis in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Park CC; Nguyen P; Hernandez C; Bettencourt R; Ramirez K; Fortney L; Hooker J; Sy E; Savides MT; Alquiraish MH; Valasek MA; Rizo E; Richards L; Brenner D; Sirlin CB; Loomba R
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Feb; 152(3):598-607.e2. PubMed ID: 27911262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of point shear wave elastography and transient elastography in the evaluation of patients with NAFLD.
    Argalia G; Ventura C; Tosi N; Campioni D; Tagliati C; Tufillaro M; Cucco M; Svegliati Baroni G; Giovagnoni A
    Radiol Med; 2022 May; 127(5):571-576. PubMed ID: 35290569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants.
    Hsu C; Caussy C; Imajo K; Chen J; Singh S; Kaulback K; Le MD; Hooker J; Tu X; Bettencourt R; Yin M; Sirlin CB; Ehman RL; Nakajima A; Loomba R
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 17(4):630-637.e8. PubMed ID: 29908362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Selvaraj EA; Mózes FE; Jayaswal ANA; Zafarmand MH; Vali Y; Lee JA; Levick CK; Young LAJ; Palaniyappan N; Liu CH; Aithal GP; Romero-Gómez M; Brosnan MJ; Tuthill TA; Anstee QM; Neubauer S; Harrison SA; Bossuyt PM; Pavlides M;
    J Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 75(4):770-785. PubMed ID: 33991635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C.
    Bohte AE; de Niet A; Jansen L; Bipat S; Nederveen AJ; Verheij J; Terpstra V; Sinkus R; van Nieuwkerk KM; de Knegt RJ; Baak BC; Jansen PL; Reesink HW; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 24158528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography to transient elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Fu F; Li X; Chen C; Bai Y; Liu Q; Shi D; Sang J; Wang K; Wang M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 31372777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Point Shear Wave Elastography by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Quantification in Comparison to Transient Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C: A Prospective International Multicenter Study.
    Friedrich-Rust M; Lupsor M; de Knegt R; Dries V; Buggisch P; Gebel M; Maier B; Herrmann E; Sagir A; Zachoval R; Shi Y; Schneider MD; Badea R; Rifai K; Poynard T; Zeuzem S; Sarrazin C
    Ultraschall Med; 2015 Jun; 36(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 25970201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography.
    Imajo K; Kessoku T; Honda Y; Tomeno W; Ogawa Y; Mawatari H; Fujita K; Yoneda M; Taguri M; Hyogo H; Sumida Y; Ono M; Eguchi Y; Inoue T; Yamanaka T; Wada K; Saito S; Nakajima A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Mar; 150(3):626-637.e7. PubMed ID: 26677985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR elastography is effective for the non-invasive evaluation of fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
    Costa-Silva L; Ferolla SM; Lima AS; Vidigal PVT; Ferrari TCA
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():82-89. PubMed ID: 29279175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association Between Obesity and Discordance in Fibrosis Stage Determination by Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography in Patients With Nonalcoholic Liver Disease.
    Caussy C; Chen J; Alquiraish MH; Cepin S; Nguyen P; Hernandez C; Yin M; Bettencourt R; Cachay ER; Jayakumar S; Fortney L; Hooker J; Sy E; Valasek MA; Rizo E; Richards L; Brenner DA; Sirlin CB; Ehman RL; Loomba R
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):1974-1982.e7. PubMed ID: 29104128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and point-shear wave elastography for significant hepatic fibrosis screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schambeck JPL; Forte GC; Gonçalves LM; Stuker G; Kotlinski JBF; Tramontin G; Altmayer S; Watte G; Hochhegger B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0271572. PubMed ID: 36730265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.
    Kennedy P; Bane O; Hectors SJ; Gordic S; Berger M; Delaney V; Salem F; Lewis S; Menon M; Taouli B
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108949. PubMed ID: 32179424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: inter-center and inter-analysis-method measurement reproducibility and accuracy at 3T.
    Tang A; Dzyubak B; Yin M; Schlein A; Henderson WC; Hooker JC; Delgado TI; Middleton MS; Zheng L; Wolfson T; Gamst A; Loomba R; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):2937-2948. PubMed ID: 34928415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing significant fibrosis using imaging-based elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients: Pilot study.
    Park HS; Choe WH; Han HS; Yu MH; Kim YJ; Jung SI; Kim JH; Kwon SY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 25(25):3256-3267. PubMed ID: 31333316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance elastography in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a study comparing transient elastography and histological data in the same patients.
    Toguchi M; Tsurusaki M; Yada N; Sofue K; Hyodo T; Onoda M; Numoto I; Matsuki M; Imaoka I; Kudo M; Murakami T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 28144720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography for hepatic fibrosis.
    Ichikawa S; Motosugi U; Morisaka H; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Tatsumi A; Enomoto N; Matsuda M; Fujii H; Onishi H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 33(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 25308096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.