300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31279137)
1. Mortality Rates in Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1253-1267.e4. PubMed ID: 31279137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Make New Friends But Keep the Old: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Programs.
Ring KL; Ramirez PT; Conrad LB; Burke W; Wendel Naumann R; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26067857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers.
Zanagnolo V; Garbi A; Achilarre MT; Minig L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):379-396. PubMed ID: 28104497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives of Gynecologic Oncologists on Minimally Invasive Surgery During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Turkish Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology (MIJOD) Survey.
Dogan NU; Bilir E; Taskin S; Vatansever D; Dogan S; Taskiran C; Celik H; Ortac F; Gungor M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 35225470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is venous thromboprophylaxis necessary in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for a gynecologic malignancy?
Bouchard-Fortier G; Geerts WH; Covens A; Vicus D; Kupets R; Gien LT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 24875122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
