228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31279621)
1. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers.
Yeu E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers.
Sabatino F; Matarazzo F; Findl O; Maurino V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1124-1129. PubMed ID: 31174987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.
Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-coherence Reflectometry and Partial-coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers.
Can E; Duran M; Çetinkaya T; Arıtürk N
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2016; 23(4):288-292. PubMed ID: 27994390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Ruiss M; Pilwachs C; Georgiev S; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
