223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31280052)
1. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations.
Lins RBE; Aristilde S; Osório JH; Cordeiro CMB; Yanikian CRF; Bicalho AA; Stape THS; Soares CJ; Martins LRM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():255-261. PubMed ID: 31280052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis.
Sampaio CS; Fernández Arias J; Atria PJ; Cáceres E; Pardo Díaz C; Freitas AZ; Hirata R
Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 31500903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the Porosity from Incremental and Bulk Resin Composite Filling Techniques on the Biomechanical Performance of Root-Treated Molars.
Pereira R; Soares P; Bicalho AA; Barcelos LM; Oliveira L; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2021 Mar; 46(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 34192325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing.
Guerra L; Ramos RQ; Linhares LA; Bernardon JK; Favero SS; César PF; Júnior SM
Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 36656317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Capped and Uncapped Bulk-fill Resin-based Materials.
Al-Nahedh HN; Alawami Z
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E43-E56. PubMed ID: 31750801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Saleh B; Nabih S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 26892364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography.
Ersen KA; Gürbüz Ö; Özcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1687-1693. PubMed ID: 31346784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap--that is the question?
Tomaszewska IM; Kearns JO; Ilie N; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25625673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites.
Fronza BM; Rueggeberg FA; Braga RR; Mogilevych B; Soares LE; Martin AA; Ambrosano G; Giannini M
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1542-51. PubMed ID: 26608118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interfacial Stress and Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill or Conventional Composite Resins to Dentin in Class II Restorations.
Duarte JCL; Costa AR; Veríssimo C; Duarte RW; Calabrez Filho S; Spohr AM; Borges GA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Braz Dent J; 2020; 31(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 33146338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
