140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31280212)
1. Evaluation of Surgical Procedures that Affect the Hemodynamics Using the FloTrac System in Esophageal Cancer Patients.
Sohda M; Kuriyama K; Kumakura Y; Yoshida T; Honjyo H; Sakai M; Miyazaki T; Kanemoto M; Tobe M; Hinohara H; Saito S; Kuwano H
In Vivo; 2019; 33(4):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 31280212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative hemodynamic changes for predicting anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer using the FloTrac system.
Sohda M; Saito H; Kumakura Y; Honjyo H; Hara K; Sakai M; Miyazaki T; Kanemoto M; Tobe M; Hinohara H; Saito S; Kuwano H
J Med Invest; 2020; 67(3.4):240-245. PubMed ID: 33148895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of intravascular volume depression and possible hypotension during the early postoperative period after esophagectomy.
Kobayashi M; Koh M; Irinoda T; Meguro E; Hayakawa Y; Takagane A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1371-7. PubMed ID: 19219508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of stroke volume index obtained with the FloTrac/ Vigileo system for the prediction of acute kidney injury after radical esophagectomy.
Sugasawa Y; Hayashida M; Yamaguchi K; Kajiyama Y; Inada E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3992-8. PubMed ID: 23797754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography.
Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Roullet S; Quinart A; Revel P; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 19608819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy.
Davies SJ; Minhas S; Wilson RJ; Yates D; Howell SJ
J Clin Anesth; 2013 Sep; 25(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 23965199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three haemodynamic monitoring methods in comatose post cardiac arrest patients.
Staer-Jensen H; Sunde K; Nakstad ER; Eritsland J; Andersen GØ
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Jun; 52(3):141-148. PubMed ID: 29544369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.
Sawa T; Kinoshita M; Kainuma A; Akiyama K; Naito Y; Kato H; Amaya F; Shigemi K
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):927-941. PubMed ID: 27492429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative monitoring of fluid responsiveness after esophageal surgery using stroke volume variation.
Kobayashi M; Ko M; Kimura T; Meguro E; Hayakawa Y; Irinoda T; Takagane A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 May; 5(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 18452380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stroke volume variation during acute normovolemic hemodilution.
Kungys G; Rose DD; Fleming NW
Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):1823-30. PubMed ID: 19923509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Thoracic Duct Resection Post Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Carcinoma Esophagus-Impact on Lymph Node Yield and Hemodynamic Parameters.
Anand S; Kalayarasan R; Chandrasekar S; Gnanasekaran S; Pottakkat B
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2019 Jun; 50(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 29344808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients.
Saito T; Tanaka K; Ebihara Y; Kurashima Y; Murakami S; Shichinohe T; Hirano S
Esophagus; 2019 Apr; 16(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30178429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Anesthetic management for removal of a giant ovarian tumor using FloTrac x Vigileo monitoring system].
Ikeda T; Kurasako N; Nishitani K; Okada S; Arai T
Masui; 2014 Apr; 63(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 24783613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Mariette C; Markar SR; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
N Engl J Med; 2019 Jan; 380(2):152-162. PubMed ID: 30625052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Trends in Respiratory Function After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Otani T; Ichikawa H; Hanyu T; Ishikawa T; Kano Y; Kanda T; Kosugi SI; Wakai T
J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():168-178. PubMed ID: 31421359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
