BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31280794)

  • 1. Determining fidelity of mixed prototypes: Effect of media and physical interaction.
    Zhou X; Rau PP
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():111-118. PubMed ID: 31280794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of the efficacy of collaborative virtual reality systems for moderated remote usability testing.
    Chalil Madathil K; Greenstein JS
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():501-514. PubMed ID: 28256209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of protoype medium on usability testing.
    Boothe C; Strawderman L; Hosea E
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 23668779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Awareness of the real-world environment when using augmented reality head-mounted display.
    Aromaa S; Väätänen A; Aaltonen I; Goriachev V; Helin K; Karjalainen J
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103145. PubMed ID: 32421637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-Fidelity Prototyping for Mobile Electronic Data Collection Forms Through Design and User Evaluation.
    Mugisha A; Babic A; Wakholi P; Tylleskär T
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 6(1):e11852. PubMed ID: 30900995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests.
    Sauer J; Seibel K; Rüttinger B
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 19632666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suitability of virtual prototypes to support human factors/ergonomics evaluation during the design.
    Aromaa S; Väänänen K
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Sep; 56():11-8. PubMed ID: 27184306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion.
    Sauer J; Sonderegger A
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 18691696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of visual fatigue caused by head-mounted display for virtual reality and two-dimensional display using objective and subjective evaluation.
    Hirota M; Kanda H; Endo T; Miyoshi T; Miyagawa S; Hirohara Y; Yamaguchi T; Saika M; Morimoto T; Fujikado T
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 30773103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a virtual reality head mounted display as a tool for posture assessment in digital human modelling software.
    Rizzuto MA; Sonne MWL; Vignais N; Keir PJ
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Sep; 79():1-8. PubMed ID: 31109457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing usability with 3D paper prototypes--Case Halton system.
    Säde S; Nieminen M; Riihiaho S
    Appl Ergon; 1998 Feb; 29(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 9769091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. VPModel: High-Fidelity Product Simulation in a Virtual-Physical Environment.
    Xin Min ; Wenqiao Zhang ; Shouqian Sun ; Nan Zhao ; Siliang Tang ; Yueting Zhuang
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2019 Nov; 25(11):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 31403424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use.
    Nichols S
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Feb; 30(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 10098819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glasses-type wearable computer displays: usability considerations examined with a 3D glasses case study.
    Chang J; Moon SK; Jung K; Kim W; Parkinson M; Freivalds A; Simpson TW; Baik SP
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):670-681. PubMed ID: 29103342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability evaluation of augmented reality visualizations on an optical see-through head-mounted display for assisting machine operations.
    Wang CH; Hsiao CY; Tai AT; Wang MJ
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104112. PubMed ID: 37591157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures.
    Sonderegger A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1350-61. PubMed ID: 19851903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research.
    Deb S; Carruth DW; Sween R; Strawderman L; Garrison TM
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():449-460. PubMed ID: 28318502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extra-laboratorial usability tests: An empirical comparison of remote and classical field testing with lab testing.
    Sauer J; Sonderegger A; Heyden K; Biller J; Klotz J; Uebelbacher A
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():85-96. PubMed ID: 30487113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game.
    McMahan RP; Bowman DA; Zielinski DJ; Brady RB
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):626-33. PubMed ID: 22402690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and evaluation of a software prototype for participatory planning of environmental adaptations.
    Eriksson J; Ek A; Johansson G
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Mar; 8(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 10779113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.