138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31281214)
1. Comparison of two continuous non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring techniques in the perioperative setting.
Jackevičiūtė J; Kraujalytė G; Jaremko I; Stremaitytė V; Gudaitytė J
Acta Med Litu; 2019; 26(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 31281214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study.
Lorenzen U; Pohlmann M; Hansen J; Klose P; Gruenewald M; Renner J; Elke G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):196. PubMed ID: 32778047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac Output Evaluation on Septic Shock Patients: Comparison between Calibrated and Uncalibrated Devices during Vasopressor Therapy.
Persona P; Valeri I; Saraceni E; De Cassai A; Calabrese F; Navalesi P
J Clin Med; 2021 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33435270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedence cardiac output: comparison with multigated equillibrium radionuclide cardiography.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Bhandopadhyaya A; Sathyaprabha TN; Janaki P; Mahalla BK; Gupta R; Banakal S; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 20229061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Saugel B; Hoppe P; Nicklas JY; Kouz K; Körner A; Hempel JC; Vos JJ; Schön G; Scheeren TWL
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jul; 125(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 32475686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Banakal S; Gupta R; Sathyaprabha TN; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Jun; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 18418719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring (esCCO) Using Pulse Wave Transit Time (PWTT) Compared to Arterial Pressure-based CO (APCO) Measurement during Major Surgeries.
Joshi M; Rathod R; Bhosale SJ; Kulkarni AP
Indian J Crit Care Med; 2022; 26(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 35656042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution in patients post open-heart surgery.
Zácek P; Kunes P; Kobzová E; Dominik J
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 1999; 42(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10566176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Bioimpedance Versus Pulse Contour Analysis for Intraoperative Cardiac Index Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation.
Aditianingsih D; Hidayat J; Ginting VM
Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Oct; 11(5):e117918. PubMed ID: 35075410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
