73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31281491)
1. Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight
Lindström E; Velikyan I; Regula N; Alhuseinalkhudhur A; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
Theranostics; 2019; 9(12):3476-3484. PubMed ID: 31281491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical
Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Delso G; Pizzuto DA; Müller J; Nagel HW; Burger IA
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30054750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced count pediatric whole-body
Alves VPV; Ata NA; MacLean J; Sharp SE; Li Y; Brady S; Trout AT
Pediatr Radiol; 2024 Jan; 54(1):170-180. PubMed ID: 37962603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [
Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.
Lantos J; Mittra ES; Levin CS; Iagaru A
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 29755844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of [
Cox CPW; Brabander T; Vegt E; de Lussanet de la Sablonière QG; Graven LH; Verburg FA; Segbers M
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 38488989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image enhancement of whole-body oncology [
Mehranian A; Wollenweber SD; Walker MD; Bradley KM; Fielding PA; Su KH; Johnsen R; Kotasidis F; Jansen FP; McGowan DR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):539-549. PubMed ID: 34318350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of PSMA PET imaging using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom and shell-less radioactive epoxy lesions.
Fedrigo R; Kadrmas DJ; Edem PE; Fougner L; Klyuzhin IS; Petric MP; Bénard F; Rahmim A; Uribe C
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 35032234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential deep learning image enhancement models improve diagnostic confidence, lesion detectability, and image reconstruction time in PET.
Dedja M; Mehranian A; Bradley KM; Walker MD; Fielding PA; Wollenweber SD; Johnsen R; McGowan DR
EJNMMI Phys; 2024 Mar; 11(1):28. PubMed ID: 38488923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning-based time-of-flight (ToF) image enhancement of non-ToF PET scans.
Mehranian A; Wollenweber SD; Walker MD; Bradley KM; Fielding PA; Huellner M; Kotasidis F; Su KH; Johnsen R; Jansen FP; McGowan DR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3740-3749. PubMed ID: 35507059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of
Weber M; Jentzen W; Hofferber R; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Umutlu L; Conti M; Costa PF; Sraieb M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33446147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Time-of-Flight and Regularized Reconstructions on Quantitative Measurements and Qualitative Assessments in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer With
Behr SC; Mollard BJ; Yang J; Flavell RR; Hawkins RA; Seo Y
Mol Imaging; 2017; 16():1536012117736703. PubMed ID: 29169313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of
Shi X; Li N; Ding H; Dang Y; Hu G; Liu S; Cui J; Zhang Y; Li F; Zhang H; Huo L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():9193403. PubMed ID: 29681784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of [
Wagatsuma K; Ikemoto K; Inaji M; Kamitaka Y; Hara S; Tamura K; Miwa K; Tsuzura K; Tsuruki T; Miyaji N; Ishibashi K; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 May; 38(5):400-407. PubMed ID: 38466549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Iterative OSEM and HYPER Algorithm for Total-body PET at SUVmax with a Low 18F-FDG Activity, a Short Acquisition Time and Small Lesions.
Zan K; Duan Y; Zhao M; Li H; Cui X; Chai L; Cheng Z
Curr Med Imaging; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38532604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acquisition Duration Optimization Using Visual Grading Regression in [
Nilsson T; Rasinski P; Smedby Ö; Af Burén S; Sparrelid E; Löhr JM; Tran TA; Blomgren A; Tzortzakakis A; Axelsson R; Holstensson M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two birds with one stone: can [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality be improved through BMI-adjusted injected activity without increasing acquisition times?
Zanoni L; Calabrò D; Fortunati E; Argalia G; Malizia C; Allegri V; Civollani S; Fanti S; Ambrosini V
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20211152. PubMed ID: 35230151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural blind deconvolution for deblurring and supersampling PSMA PET.
Sample C; Rahmim A; Uribe C; Bénard F; Wu J; Fedrigo R; Clark H
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Apr; 69(8):. PubMed ID: 38513292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of [
Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Brolin G; Bitzén U; Olsson B; Oddstig J
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 May; 7(1):31. PubMed ID: 32399664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
