These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31281791)

  • 1. Optimization of exposure parameters and relationship between subjective and technical image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Park HN; Min CK; Kim KA; Koh KJ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Jun; 49(2):139-151. PubMed ID: 31281791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between physical factors and subjective image quality of cone-beam computed tomography images according to diagnostic task.
    Choi JW; Lee SS; Choi SC; Heo MS; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Kang SR; Han DH; Kim EK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Mar; 119(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 25592866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
    Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.
    Al-Okshi A; Theodorakou C; Lindh C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160311. PubMed ID: 27910717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between CNR and visibility of anatomical structures of cone-beam computed tomography images under different exposure parameters.
    Wang MF; Xie X; Li G; Zhang Z
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(5):20190336. PubMed ID: 32045279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the priority of anatomic structures according to the diagnostic task in cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Choi JW
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Dec; 46(4):245-249. PubMed ID: 28035302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
    Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Projection Quality-Driven Tube Current Modulation Method in Cone-Beam CT for IGRT: Proof of Concept.
    Men K; Dai J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 29332447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial resolution measurements by Radia diagnostic software with SEDENTEXCT image quality phantom in cone beam CT for dental use.
    Watanabe H; Nomura Y; Kuribayashi A; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(3):20170307. PubMed ID: 29161903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom.
    Elkhateeb SM; Torgersen GR; Arnout EA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20160075. PubMed ID: 27078054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality optimization of narrow detector dental computed tomography for paediatric patients.
    Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Jul; 48(5):20190032. PubMed ID: 30864834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry.
    Alawaji Y; MacDonald DS; Giannelis G; Ford NL
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2018 Dec; 4(6):268-278. PubMed ID: 30603109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed Tomography Angiography of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: Low Contrast Media Volume Protocols Adapted to Tube Voltage.
    Higashigaito K; Husarik DB; Barthelmes J; Plass AR; Manka R; Maisano F; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Apr; 51(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 26646307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
    Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.