BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31282286)

  • 1. An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.
    Sun Y; Sun Z; Jiang Y; Li Y; Ma S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1325-1337. PubMed ID: 31282286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust nonparametric integrative analysis to decipher heterogeneity and commonality across subgroups using sparse boosting.
    Li Z; Luo Z; Sun Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1658-1687. PubMed ID: 35072291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revealing genomic heterogeneity and commonality: A penalized integrative analysis approach accounting for the adjacency structure of measurements.
    Wang X; Jiang Y; Sun Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; 48(3):114-140. PubMed ID: 38317326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.
    Ma S; Huang J; Xie Y; Yi N
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 22344268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.
    Huang Y; Liu J; Yi H; Shia BC; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):509-559. PubMed ID: 27667129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of cancer omics commonality and difference via community fusion.
    Sun Y; Jiang Y; Li Y; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1200-1212. PubMed ID: 30421444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of cancer genomic markers via integrative sparse boosting.
    Huang Y; Huang J; Shia BC; Ma S
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jul; 13(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 22045909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrative analysis of multiple cancer genomic datasets under the heterogeneity model.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3509-21. PubMed ID: 23519988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse multiple co-Inertia analysis with application to integrative analysis of multi -Omics data.
    Min EJ; Long Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):141. PubMed ID: 32293260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust semiparametric gene-environment interaction analysis using sparse boosting.
    Wu M; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4625-4641. PubMed ID: 31359454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating network structure in integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 23161517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrative prescreening in analysis of multiple cancer genomic studies.
    Song R; Huang J; Ma S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():168. PubMed ID: 22799431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrative analysis of high-throughput cancer studies with contrasted penalization.
    Shi X; Liu J; Huang J; Zhou Y; Shia B; Ma S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 38(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 24395534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian framework for pathway-guided identification of cancer subgroups by integrating multiple types of genomic data.
    Sun Z; Chung D; Neelon B; Millar-Wilson A; Ethier SP; Xiao F; Zheng Y; Wallace K; Hardiman G
    Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(28):5266-5284. PubMed ID: 37715500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Penalization Method for Estimating Heterogeneous Covariate Effects in Cancer Genomic Data.
    Luo Z; Zhang Y; Sun Y
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 35456506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrative sparse principal component analysis of gene expression data.
    Liu M; Fan X; Fang K; Zhang Q; Ma S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):844-865. PubMed ID: 29114920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sparse group penalized integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis datasets.
    Liu J; Huang J; Xie Y; Ma S
    Genet Res (Camb); 2013 Jun; 95(2-3):68-77. PubMed ID: 23938111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrative regression network for genomic association study.
    Vangimalla RR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
    BMC Med Genomics; 2016 Aug; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):31. PubMed ID: 27535739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. InterSIM: Simulation tool for multiple integrative 'omic datasets'.
    Chalise P; Raghavan R; Fridley BL
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 May; 128():69-74. PubMed ID: 27040832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semiparametric integrative interaction analysis for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Li Y; Wang F; Li R; Sun Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2865-2880. PubMed ID: 32281490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.