These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31282286)

  • 21. Integrative Analysis of Cancer Diagnosis Studies with Composite Penalization.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2014 Mar; 41(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 24578589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrative Analysis of Pathological Images and Multi-Dimensional Genomic Data for Early-Stage Cancer Prognosis.
    Shao W; Han Z; Cheng J; Cheng L; Wang T; Sun L; Lu Z; Zhang J; Zhang D; Huang K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 39(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 31170067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gene-environment interaction identification via penalized robust divergence.
    Ren M; Zhang S; Ma S; Zhang Q
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):461-480. PubMed ID: 34725857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Promoting Similarity of Sparsity Structures in Integrative Analysis with Penalization.
    Huang Y; Zhang Q; Zhang S; Huang J; Ma S
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):342-350. PubMed ID: 30100648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integrative sparse partial least squares.
    Liang W; Ma S; Zhang Q; Zhu T
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2239-2256. PubMed ID: 33559203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of Breast Cancer Prognosis Markers via Integrative Analysis.
    Ma S; Dai Y; Huang J; Xie Y
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Sep; 56(9):2718-2728. PubMed ID: 22773869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clustering multilayer omics data using MuNCut.
    Teran Hidalgo SJ; Ma S
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):198. PubMed ID: 29703159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Penalized estimation of a class of single-index varying-coefficient models for integrative genomic analysis.
    Ng HM; Jiang B; Wong KY
    Biom J; 2023 Jan; 65(1):e2100139. PubMed ID: 35837982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrative Analysis of Multi-Genomic Data for Kidney Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Singh A; Goel N; Yogita
    Interdiscip Sci; 2020 Mar; 12(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 31392539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Cancer Genome Atlas Clinical Explorer: a web and mobile interface for identifying clinical-genomic driver associations.
    Lee H; Palm J; Grimes SM; Ji HP
    Genome Med; 2015 Oct; 7():112. PubMed ID: 26507825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semi-supervised identification of cancer subgroups using survival outcomes and overlapping grouping information.
    Wei W; Sun Z; da Silveira WA; Yu Z; Lawson A; Hardiman G; Kelemen LE; Chung D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2137-2149. PubMed ID: 29336210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sparse boosting for high-dimensional survival data with varying coefficients.
    Yue M; Li J; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):789-800. PubMed ID: 29152776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prior information-assisted integrative analysis of multiple datasets.
    Wang F; Liang D; Li Y; Ma S
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 37490475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of supervised and sparse functional genomic pathways.
    Zhang F; Miecznikowski JC; Tritchler DL
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 32109224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overlapping group screening for detection of gene-environment interactions with application to TCGA high-dimensional survival genomic data.
    Wang JH; Wang KH; Chen YH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 May; 23(1):202. PubMed ID: 35637439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Novel Cox Proportional Hazards Model for High-Dimensional Genomic Data in Cancer Prognosis.
    Huang HH; Liang Y
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(5):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 31870990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrative Analysis of Cancer Omics Data for Prognosis Modeling.
    Wang S; Wu M; Ma S
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31405076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integrative network analysis for survival-associated gene-gene interactions across multiple genomic profiles in ovarian cancer.
    Jeong HH; Leem S; Wee K; Sohn KA
    J Ovarian Res; 2015 Jul; 8():42. PubMed ID: 26138921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.