145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31282294)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Isiris™ for Ureteric Stent Removal in Renal Transplantation: An Initial Single-Centre Experience of 150 Cases.
Doherty DT; Moinuddin Z; Grey BR; van Dellen D
Surg Innov; 2021 Jun; 28(3):366-370. PubMed ID: 33780633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.
Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P
Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office-based ureteric stent removal is achievable, improves clinical flexibility and quality of care, whilst also keeping surgeons close to their patients.
Baston EL; Wellum S; Bredow Z; Storey G; Palmer A; van Dellen D; Grey BR
Cent European J Urol; 2018; 71(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 30038810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction.
Assmus MA; Krambeck AE; Lee MS; Agarwal DK; Mellon M; Rivera ME; Large T
Urology; 2022 Sep; 167():61-66. PubMed ID: 35772484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope.
Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Economics of Cystoscopy: A Microcost Analysis.
Kenigsberg AP; Gold S; Grant L; Lotan Y
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():29-34. PubMed ID: 34010677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
