156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31282981)
1. The Effect Of Increasing Femoral Head Size On The Force Required For Dislocation.
Dietz MJ; Moushmoush O; Samora WP; Kish VL; Hamlin BR
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():426-429. PubMed ID: 31282981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of head diameter on passive and active dynamic hip dislocation.
Bunn A; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1525-31. PubMed ID: 24961686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior dislocation after total hip replacement - effects of pelvic rotation and femoral head size.
Ng FY; Wang Q; Chiu KY; Yan CH
Hip Int; 2013; 23(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 23813162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
Tabata T; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hip stability after total hip arthroplasty predicted by intraoperative stability test and range of motion: a cross-sectional study.
Tanino H; Sato T; Nishida Y; Mitsutake R; Ito H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Oct; 19(1):373. PubMed ID: 30322394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Capsular Laxity Lead to Microinstability of the Native Hip?
Han S; Alexander JW; Thomas VS; Choi J; Harris JD; Doherty DB; Jeffers JRT; Noble PC
Am J Sports Med; 2018 May; 46(6):1315-1323. PubMed ID: 29505731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Minimum Ten Years of Follow-Up of Alumina Head on Delta Liner Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Choy WS; Cha YH; Jeon CY; Lee KS; Kim HY
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):470-476. PubMed ID: 28958658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study on association between femoral head size and linear wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene liner].
Guo S; Sun J; Zha G; Wei S; Lu Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 28(11):1333-7. PubMed ID: 25639045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hip capsule biomechanics after arthroplasty: the effect of implant, approach, and surgical repair.
Logishetty K; van Arkel RJ; Ng KCG; Muirhead-Allwood SK; Cobb JP; Jeffers JRT
Bone Joint J; 2019 Apr; 101-B(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 30929480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: point of diminishing returns.
Klingenstein GG; Yeager AM; Lipman JD; Westrich GH
Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22773504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads.
Bistolfi A; Crova M; Rosso F; Titolo P; Ventura S; Massazza G
Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 21948039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cadaver-Specific Models for Finite-Element Analysis of Iliopsoas Impingement in Dual-Mobility Hip Implants.
Zumbrunn T; Patel R; Duffy MP; Rubash HE; Malchau H; Freiberg AA; Muratoglu OK; Varadarajan KM
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Nov; 33(11):3574-3580. PubMed ID: 30029930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES; Martell JM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 25903943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
