BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31283042)

  • 1. Single-dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Park Y; Kim DS; Jeon MJ; Lee BH; Yu ES; Kang KW; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Nam MH; Yoon SY; Choi CW; Kang ES; Cho D; Kim K; Kim BS; Kim DW; Kim SJ
    J Clin Apher; 2019 Oct; 34(5):579-588. PubMed ID: 31283042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
    J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C
    J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
    Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
    Shimura Y; Kuroda J; Uchiyama H; Kawata-Iida E; Tsutsumi Y; Nagoshi H; Mizutani S; Yamamoto-Sugitani M; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi T; Horiike S; Shimazaki C; Kaneko H; Kobayashi Y; Taniwaki M
    J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23804501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
    Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
    Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T
    J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients.
    Winkelmann N; Desole M; Hilgendorf I; Ernst T; Sayer HG; Kunert C; Mügge LO; Hochhaus A; Scholl S
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 142(12):2603-2610. PubMed ID: 27640002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide Combined with Cyclophosphamide for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
    Tu ST; Zhou YL; Li F
    Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1410-1414. PubMed ID: 37846692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclophosphamide plus etoposide is a safe and effective mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Heider M; Grass S; Dill V; Rämisch S; Winter C; Verbeek M; Götze KS; Bassermann F; Jilg S
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2021 Oct; 60(5):103197. PubMed ID: 34175195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemomobilization with high-dose etoposide and G-CSF results in effective and safe stem cell collection in heavily pretreated lymphoma patients: report from a single institution study and review.
    Ozkan HA; Bal C; Gulbas Z
    Eur J Haematol; 2014; 92(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 24400988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].
    Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG
    Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chemomobilization with Etoposide is Highly Effective in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Overcomes the Effects of Age and Prior Therapy.
    Wood WA; Whitley J; Moore D; Sharf A; Irons R; Rao K; Serody J; Coghill J; Gabriel D; Shea T
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2011 Jan; 17(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 20637882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of engraftment following different stem cell mobilization modalities in patients with multiple myeloma treated with a uniform induction regimen containing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone.
    Benyamini N; Avivi I; Dann EJ; Zuckerman T; Lavi N; Katz T
    Ann Hematol; 2017 Mar; 96(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 28013359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective comparison of mobilization methods for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Nakasone H; Kanda Y; Ueda T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu N; Minami J; Sakai R; Hagihara M; Yokota A; Oshima K; Tsukada Y; Tachibana T; Nakaseko C; Fujisawa S; Yano S; Fujita H; Takahashi S; Kanamori H; Okamoto S;
    Am J Hematol; 2009 Dec; 84(12):809-14. PubMed ID: 19862826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparison of Filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) as a first line peripheral blood stem cell mobilization strategy in autologous hematopoieitic stem cell transplantation: a single center experience from Turkey.
    Sivgin S; Karakus E; Kaynar L; Kurnaz F; Pala C; Keklik M; Zararsiz G; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Jun; 48(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 23611684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Intermediate-High-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Zannetti BA; Saraceni F; Cellini C; Fabbri E; Monaco F; Guarini A; Laszlo D; Martino M; Olivieri A; Imola M; Tosi P; Chiarucci M; Zuffa E; Lanza F
    Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Mar; 27(3):244.e1-244.e8. PubMed ID: 33781522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter report by the Polish Myeloma Study Group.
    Drozd-Sokołowska J; Waszczuk-Gajda A; Topczewska M; Mańko J; Hus I; Szmigielska-Kapłon A; Nowicki M; Grygoruk-Wiśniowska I; Krawczyk-Kuliś M; Romejko-Jarosińska J; Frączak E; Wróbel T; Piątkowska-Jakubas B; Mądry K; Boguradzki P; Król M; Kozioł M; Hus M; Kopińska A; Dmoszyńska A; Basak GW; Dwilewicz-Trojaczek J
    J Clin Apher; 2021 Jun; 36(3):443-453. PubMed ID: 33592119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.