These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31283529)

  • 1. Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.
    Bidelman GM; Brown B; Mankel K; Nelms Price C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):268-277. PubMed ID: 31283529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word Learning in Deaf Adults Who Use Cochlear Implants: The Role of Talker Variability and Attention to the Mouth.
    Hartman J; Saffran J; Litovsky R
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):337-350. PubMed ID: 37695563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
    Stacey JE; Howard CJ; Mitra S; Stacey PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3544-3557. PubMed ID: 32533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face Masks Impact Auditory and Audiovisual Consonant Recognition in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Lalonde K; Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():874345. PubMed ID: 35645844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.
    Atcherson SR; Mendel LL; Baltimore WJ; Patro C; Lee S; Pousson M; Spann MJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28054912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye Gaze and Perceptual Adaptation to Audiovisual Degraded Speech.
    Banks B; Gowen E; Munro KJ; Adank P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3432-3445. PubMed ID: 34463528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.
    Gordon-Salant S; Schwartz MS; Oppler KA; Yeni-Komshian GH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772867. PubMed ID: 35153900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker variability in audio-visual speech perception.
    Heald SL; Nusbaum HC
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():698. PubMed ID: 25076919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.
    Buchan JN; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():162-71. PubMed ID: 18621032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing the Talker's Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults With Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Rudner M; Mishra S; Stenfelt S; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 27280873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance in an Audiovisual Selective Attention Task Using Speech-Like Stimuli Depends on the Talker Identities, But Not Temporal Coherence.
    Cappelloni MS; Mateo VS; Maddox RK
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231207235. PubMed ID: 37847849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.
    Shan T; Wenner CE; Xu C; Duan Z; Maddox RK
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221136934. PubMed ID: 36384325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.