171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31284202)
1. Evaluation of commercial forensic DNA extraction kits for decontamination and extraction of DNA from biological samples contaminated with radionuclides.
Toole K; Roffey P; Young E; Cho K; Shaw T; Smith M; Blagojevic N
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109867. PubMed ID: 31284202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulated radioactive decontamination of biological samples using a portable DNA extraction instrument for rapid DNA profiling.
Frégeau CJ; Dalpé C
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():161-78. PubMed ID: 26773226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of four methods for PCR inhibitor removal.
Hu Q; Liu Y; Yi S; Huang D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():94-97. PubMed ID: 25553520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes.
Szkuta B; Oorschot RAHV; Ballantyne KN
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():41-50. PubMed ID: 28577456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compatibility of DNA IQ™, QIAamp
Lin SW; Ip SC; Lam TT; Tan TF; Yeung WL; Tam WM
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Mar; 131(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 27654715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing a novel automated magnetic bead-based method for the extraction of DNA from a variety of forensic samples.
Witt S; Neumann J; Zierdt H; Gébel G; Röscheisen C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):539-47. PubMed ID: 22310206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
Kasu M; Shires K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIAsymphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™.
Ip SC; Lin SW; Lai KM
Sci Justice; 2015 May; 55(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 25934373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An economical and efficient method for postmortem DNA sampling in mass fatalities.
Mundorff AZ; Amory S; Huel R; Bilić A; Scott AL; Parsons TJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():167-175. PubMed ID: 30032092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Powder-free DNA Extraction Workflow for Skeletal Samples.
Harrel M; Hughes-Stamm S
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):601-609. PubMed ID: 31577371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success.
Zeng X; Elwick K; Mayes C; Takahashi M; King JL; Gangitano D; Budowle B; Hughes-Stamm S
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 30341454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a 'decontamination kit' in NSW.
Stark MM; Nittis M
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Jul; 25():53-4. PubMed ID: 24931862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence based decontamination protocols for the removal of external Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from contaminated hair.
Duvivier WF; Peeters RJ; van Beek TA; Nielen MW
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():110-8. PubMed ID: 26773221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of commercial kits for dual extraction of DNA and RNA from human body fluids.
Schweighardt AJ; Tate CM; Scott KA; Harper KA; Robertson JM
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 25284026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of the QIAamp DNA Investigator Kit and Prepfiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit in genomic DNA extraction from skeletal remains].
Ludwikowska-Pawłowska M; Jacewicz R; Jedrzejczyk M; Prośniak A; Berent J
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 20860301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated processing of forensic casework samples using robotic workstations equipped with nondisposable tips: contamination prevention.
Frégeau CJ; Lett CM; Elliott J; Yensen C; Fourney RM
J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):632-51. PubMed ID: 18471209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Efficiency of three commercial kits dedicated to DNA and RNA isolation from various clinical and forensic materials using the Janus automated workstation].
Małodobra M; Jonkisz A; Kowalczyk E; Lebioda A; Bartnik B; Swiatek B
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 22117489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
