These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31284769)

  • 1. A qualitative evaluation of clinically coded data quality from health information manager perspectives.
    Doktorchik C; Lu M; Quan H; Ringham C; Eastwood C
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 31284769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Barriers to data quality resulting from the process of coding health information to administrative data: a qualitative study.
    Lucyk K; Tang K; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):766. PubMed ID: 29166905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health records as the basis of clinical coding: Is the quality adequate? A qualitative study of medical coders' perceptions.
    Alonso V; Santos JV; Pinto M; Ferreira J; Lema I; Lopes F; Freitas A
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 30744403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical coding and the quality and integrity of health data.
    Shepheard J
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 31510815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted clinical coding: A narrative review of the literature on its benefits, limitations, implementation and impact on clinical coding professionals.
    Campbell S; Giadresco K
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 31159578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders' Perceptions.
    Alonso V; Santos JV; Pinto M; Ferreira J; Lema I; Lopes F; Freitas A
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):62. PubMed ID: 32036459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of clinical documentation improvement for Australian hospitals.
    Hay P; Wilton K; Barker J; Mortley J; Cumerlato M
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 31303061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do we really want from clinical documentation improvement programs?
    Shepheard J
    Health Inf Manag; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28952382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Winning the Coding Trifecta: CAC, CDI, and ICD-10. How CAC can strengthen your CDI Program and Increase Collaboration with Coding and Quality Improvement.
    Whittle K
    J AHIMA; 2016 Sep; 87(9):29-31`. PubMed ID: 29400425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data quality: not selling ourselves short.
    Jackson T
    Health Inf Manag; 2014; 43(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 24948660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disparity in coding concordance: do physicians and coders agree?
    Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
    J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):43-53. PubMed ID: 12908653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding.
    Santos S; Murphy G; Baxter K; Robinson KM
    Health Inf Manag; 2008; 37(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18245862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving Coding and Documentation Quality Through Real-Time Collaboration: Nurses and Coding Professionals Team Up to Tackle Documentation Issues.
    Horn K; Younger A; Snow T
    J AHIMA; 2016 Aug; 87(8):32-4. PubMed ID: 29425009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Coders' Perspectives on Pressure Injury Coding in Acute Care Services in Victoria, Australia.
    Weller CD; Turnour L; Connelly E; Banaszak-Holl J; Team V
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():893482. PubMed ID: 35719639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coder perspectives on physician-related barriers to producing high-quality administrative data: a qualitative study.
    Tang KL; Lucyk K; Quan H
    CMAJ Open; 2017 Aug; 5(3):E617-E622. PubMed ID: 28827414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of questions regarding morbidity coding posted to the online coding clinic of the Korean Medical Record Association.
    Boo Y; Han WM; Lim H; Choi Y
    Health Inf Manag; 2014; 43(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 27009794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of medical record documentation and External cause of fall injury coding in a tertiary teaching hospital.
    Cunningham J; Williamson D; Robinson KM; Carroll R; Buchanan R; Paul L
    Health Inf Manag; 2014; 43(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 27010684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Best practice in the management of clinical coding services: Insights from a project in the Republic of Ireland, Part 2.
    Reid BA; Ridoutt L; O'Connor P; Murphy D
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):105-112. PubMed ID: 28537204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research.
    Hanson JL; Stephens MB; Pangaro LN; Gimbel RW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Nov; 12():407. PubMed ID: 23164470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of discrepancies between adverse drug reactions coded by medical records technicians and those reported by the pharmacovigilance team in pediatrics: An intervention to improve identification, reporting, and coding.
    Soyer J; Necsoiu D; Desjardins I; Lebel D; Bussières JF
    Arch Pediatr; 2019 Oct; 26(7):400-406. PubMed ID: 31611146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.