172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31284987)
1. A cross-cultural perspective on impact of health and nutrition claims, country-of-origin and eco-label on consumer choice of new aquaculture products.
Banovic M; Reinders MJ; Claret A; Guerrero L; Krystallis A
Food Res Int; 2019 Sep; 123():36-47. PubMed ID: 31284987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments.
Risius A; Janssen M; Hamm U
Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():246-254. PubMed ID: 28223237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.
Talati Z; Norman R; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Kelly B; Dixon H; Ball K; Miller C; Shilton T
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Dec; 14(1):171. PubMed ID: 29258543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of nutritional warnings and other label features on consumers' choice: Results from an eye-tracking study.
Tórtora G; Machín L; Ares G
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():605-611. PubMed ID: 30884695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumer preferences regarding the introduction of new organic products. The case of the Mediterranean sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Italy.
Mauracher C; Tempesta T; Vecchiato D
Appetite; 2013 Apr; 63():84-91. PubMed ID: 23268110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.
Ni Mhurchu C; Eyles H; Jiang Y; Blakely T
Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():360-365. PubMed ID: 29191745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spanish Consumer Purchase Behaviour and Stated Preferences for Yoghurts with Nutritional and Health Claims.
Ballco P; De Magistris T
Nutrients; 2019 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 31726708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumers' purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play?
Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104337. PubMed ID: 31260708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organic Consumer Choices for Nutrient Labels on Dried Strawberries among Different Health Attitude Segments in Norway, Romania, and Turkey.
Almli VL; Asioli D; Rocha C
Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31817079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Product reformulation in the context of nutritional warning labels: Exploration of consumer preferences towards food concepts in three food categories.
Ares G; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Antúnez L; Machín L; Vidal L; Giménez A
Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():669-674. PubMed ID: 29580533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: The role of perceived consumer effectiveness.
Ghvanidze S; Velikova N; Dodd TH; Oldewage-Theron W
Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():311-322. PubMed ID: 27554182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making sense of the "clean label" trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications.
Asioli D; Aschemann-Witzel J; Caputo V; Vecchio R; Annunziata A; Næs T; Varela P
Food Res Int; 2017 Sep; 99(Pt 1):58-71. PubMed ID: 28784520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthy choice label does not substantially improve consumers' ability to select healthier cereals: results of an online experiment.
Siegrist M; Hartmann C; Lazzarini GA
Br J Nutr; 2019 Jun; 121(11):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 30834850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
