223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31285157)
1. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.
Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.
Johannsen KM; de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig JM; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):394-407. PubMed ID: 36178613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion?
Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Jun; 20(2):56-57. PubMed ID: 31253968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review.
Bohner L; Hanisch M; Sesma N; Blanck-Lubarsch M; Kleinheinz J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20210450. PubMed ID: 35348371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.
Zachriat C; Asbach P; Blankenstein KI; Peroz I; Blankenstein FH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20140416. PubMed ID: 25734243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fleming PS; Dibiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 19123718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do fixed orthodontic appliances cause halitosis? A systematic review.
Abdulraheem S; Paulsson L; Petrén S; Sonesson M
BMC Oral Health; 2019 May; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 31046726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
