These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31285667)

  • 1. Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment.
    Vaisson G; Witteman HO; Chipenda-Dansokho S; Saragosa M; Bouck Z; Bravo CA; Desveaux L; Llovet D; Presseau J; Taljaard M; Umar S; Grimshaw JM; Tinmouth J; Ivers NM
    Curr Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):205-216. PubMed ID: 31285667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing Behavior Change Techniques to Encourage Primary Care Physicians to Access Cancer Screening Audit and Feedback Reports: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Experiment of Email Content.
    Vaisson G; Witteman HO; Bouck Z; Bravo CA; Desveaux L; Llovet D; Presseau J; Saragosa M; Taljaard M; Umar S; Grimshaw JM; Tinmouth J; Ivers NM
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Feb; 7(2):e11. PubMed ID: 29453190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process.
    Bravo CA; Llovet D; Witteman HO; Desveaux L; Presseau J; Saragosa M; Vaisson G; Umar S; Tinmouth J; Ivers NM
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 5(3):e25. PubMed ID: 30181108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message.
    White CB; Moyer CA; Stern DT; Katz SJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15064295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the effect of an audit and feedback reporting tool on screening participation: The Primary Care Screening Activity Report (PCSAR).
    Jonah L; Pefoyo AK; Lee A; Hader J; Strasberg S; Kupets R; Chiarelli AM; Tinmouth J
    Prev Med; 2017 Mar; 96():135-143. PubMed ID: 27923667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing Tailored Communications for Health Risk Assessment: A Randomized Factorial Experiment of the Effects of Expectancy Priming, Autonomy Support, and Exemplification.
    Valle CG; Queen TL; Martin BA; Ribisl KM; Mayer DK; Tate DF
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e63. PubMed ID: 29496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.
    Cutrona SL; Wagner J; Roblin DW; Gaglio B; Williams A; Torres-Stone R; Mazor KM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(5):589-98. PubMed ID: 25839968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation.
    McCleary N; Desveaux L; Presseau J; Reis C; Witteman HO; Taljaard M; Linklater S; Thavorn K; Dobell G; Mulhall CL; Lam JMC; Grimshaw JM; Ivers NM
    Implement Sci; 2023 May; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 37165413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered?
    Roter DL; Larson S; Sands DZ; Ford DE; Houston T
    Health Commun; 2008; 23(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 18443995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescents' Perspectives on Personalized E-Feedback in the Context of Health Risk Behavior Screening for Primary Care: Qualitative Study.
    Zieve GG; Richardson LP; Katzman K; Spielvogle H; Whitehouse S; McCarty CA
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e261. PubMed ID: 28729236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial.
    Ivers NM; Desveaux L; Presseau J; Reis C; Witteman HO; Taljaard MK; McCleary N; Thavorn K; Grimshaw JM
    Implement Sci; 2017 Jul; 12(1):86. PubMed ID: 28705208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change.
    Landis-Lewis Z; Brehaut JC; Hochheiser H; Douglas GP; Jacobson RS
    Implement Sci; 2015 Jan; 10():12. PubMed ID: 25603806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Hocking JS; Temple-Smith M; van Driel M; Law M; Guy R; Bulfone L; Wood A; Low N; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Kaldor J; Gunn J
    Implement Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27624835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised trial of the effect of appearance versus health-framed messages on engagement with an online brief screening and alcohol reduction intervention.
    Sallis A; Attwood S; Harper H; Larsen J; Berry D; Vlaev I; Sanders M; Chadborn T
    Psychol Health; 2019 Aug; 34(8):922-942. PubMed ID: 30917673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.
    Cook DA; Wittich CM; Daniels WL; West CP; Harris AM; Beebe TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e244. PubMed ID: 27637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Primary Care Provider Strategies Improve Patient Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening?
    Baxter NN; Sutradhar R; Li Q; Daly C; Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Richardson DP; Del Giudice L; Tinmouth J; Paszat L; Rabeneck L
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2017 Apr; 112(4):622-632. PubMed ID: 28244494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study.
    Chan EC; Vernon SW
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S117-22. PubMed ID: 18725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using sequential e-mail messages to promote health behaviors: evidence of feasibility and reach in a worksite sample.
    Franklin PD; Rosenbaum PF; Carey MP; Roizen MF
    J Med Internet Res; 2006 Mar; 8(1):e3. PubMed ID: 16585028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.
    Seguin R; Godwin M; MacDonald S; McCall M
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Mar; 50():414-9. PubMed ID: 15318679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived Barriers to and Facilitators of Patient-to-Provider E-Mail in the Management of Diabetes Care.
    Popeski N; McKeen C; Khokhar B; Edwards A; Ghali WA; Sargious P; White D; Hebert M; Rabi DM
    Can J Diabetes; 2015 Dec; 39(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 26409770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.