These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31285888)

  • 1. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low and intermediate risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score matching observational studies.
    Fu J; Popal MS; Li Y; Li G; Qi Y; Fang F; Kwong JSW; You B; Meng X; Du J
    J Thorac Dis; 2019 May; 11(5):1945-1962. PubMed ID: 31285888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD013319. PubMed ID: 31860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg A; Rao SV; Visveswaran G; Agrawal S; Sharma A; Garg L; Mahata I; Garg J; Singal D; Cohen M; Kostis JB
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):209-216. PubMed ID: 28570236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Fan P; Ye YZ; Ma X
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 50(9):913-919. PubMed ID: 36096710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Results Following Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Caminiti R; Ielasi A; Vetta G; Parlavecchio A; Rocca DGD; Glauber M; Tespili M; Vizzari G; Micari A
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Nov; 230():6-13. PubMed ID: 39173988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 randomized controlled trials.
    Ding Y; Wan M; Zhang H; Wang C; Dai Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(28):e26613. PubMed ID: 34260547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
    Lou Y; Gao Y; Yu Y; Li Y; Xi Z; Swe KNC; Zhou Y; Nie X; Liu W
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():590975. PubMed ID: 33304932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ueshima D; Fovino LN; D'Amico G; Brener SJ; Esposito G; Tarantini G
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2019 Jul; 34(3):216-225. PubMed ID: 30232711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Polimeni A; Sorrentino S; De Rosa S; Spaccarotella C; Mongiardo A; Sabatino J; Indolfi C
    J Clin Med; 2020 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32041189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midterm outcome of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate risk patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang Y; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Zhu J
    J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29655505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic stenosis at low-intermediate risk.
    Khan MR; Kayani WT; Manan M; Munir A; Hamzeh I; Virani SS; Birnbaum Y; Jneid H; Alam M
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2020 Apr; 10(2):135-144. PubMed ID: 32420093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with non-high surgical risk severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.
    Enezate TH; Kumar A; Fadel MA; Patel M; Al Dadah A; Omran J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S40-S48. PubMed ID: 28410995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the safety and efficacy of TAVR compared to SAVR in low-to-intermediate surgical risk patients with aortic valve stenosis: An overview of reviews.
    Mc Morrow R; Kriza C; Urbán P; Amenta V; Amaro JAB; Panidis D; Chassaigne H; Griesinger CB
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 314():43-53. PubMed ID: 32434749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.