192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31286156)
1. Establishing operant conflict tests for the translational study of anxiety in mice.
Oberrauch S; Sigrist H; Sautter E; Gerster S; Bach DR; Pryce CR
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2527-2541. PubMed ID: 31286156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mouse strain differences in punished ethanol self-administration.
Halladay LR; Kocharian A; Holmes A
Alcohol; 2017 Feb; 58():83-92. PubMed ID: 27814928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contributions of basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens subregions to mediating motivational conflict during punished reward-seeking.
Piantadosi PT; Yeates DCM; Wilkins M; Floresco SB
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Apr; 140():92-105. PubMed ID: 28242266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Greater resistance to footshock punishment in female C57BL/6J mice responding for ethanol.
Sneddon EA; Fennell KA; Bhati S; Setters JE; Schuh KM; DeMedio JN; Arnold BJ; Monroe SC; Quinn JJ; Radke AK
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken); 2023 Apr; 47(4):678-686. PubMed ID: 36822578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel operant conflict procedure using incrementing shock intensities to assess the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of drugs.
Evenden J; Ross L; Jonak G; Zhou J
Behav Pharmacol; 2009 May; 20(3):226-36. PubMed ID: 19455771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maudsley reactive (MR/Har) and nonreactive (MNRA/Har) rats: performance in an operant conflict paradigm.
Commissaris RL; Franklin L; Verbanac JS; Altman HJ
Physiol Behav; 1992 Nov; 52(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 1484842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of chronic antidepressants in an operant conflict procedure of anxiety in the rat.
Beaufour CC; Ballon N; Le Bihan C; Hamon M; Thiébot MH
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Apr; 62(4):591-9. PubMed ID: 10208363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of drug discrimination history on anti-punishment properties of chlordiazepoxide in rats.
Pattij T; Hijzen TH; Gommans J; Maes RA; Olivier B
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2000 Nov; 67(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 11164094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CCK receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety: comparison between exploration tests, conflict procedures and a model based on defensive behaviours.
Griebel G; Perrault G; Sanger DJ
Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Nov; 8(6-7):549-60. PubMed ID: 9832969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lever pressing responses under a fixed-ratio schedule of mice with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine depletion in the nucleus accumbens.
Tsutsui Y; Nishizawa K; Kai N; Kobayashi K
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 217(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20943202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex Differences in Ethanol Reward Seeking Under Conflict in Mice.
Xie Q; Buck LA; Bryant KG; Barker JM
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1556-1566. PubMed ID: 31034618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of the prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala to behavioral decision-making under reward/punishment conflict.
Ishikawa J; Sakurai Y; Ishikawa A; Mitsushima D
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Mar; 237(3):639-654. PubMed ID: 31912190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of SB 200646A, a 5-HT2C/5-HT2B receptor antagonist, in two conflict models of anxiety.
Kennett GA; Bailey F; Piper DC; Blackburn TP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Mar; 118(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 7617805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anti-anxiety self-medication in rats: oral consumption of chlordiazepoxide and ethanol after reward devaluation.
Manzo L; Donaire R; Sabariego M; Papini MR; Torres C
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():90-7. PubMed ID: 25242284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FG 7142 selectively decreases nonpunished responding, but has no anxiogenic effects on time allocation in a conflict schedule.
Panlilio LV; Weiss SJ; Thomas DA; Glowa JR
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 108(1-2):185-8. PubMed ID: 1329131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Behavioral models of anxiety in animals].
Thiebot MH
Encephale; 1983; 9(4 Suppl 2):167B-176B. PubMed ID: 6144511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of modulation of NMDA neurotransmission on response rate and duration in a conflict procedure in rats.
Wiley JL; Compton AD; Holcomb JD; McCallum SE; Varvel SA; Porter JH; Balster RL
Neuropharmacology; 1998 Dec; 37(12):1527-34. PubMed ID: 9886675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anxiolytic-like effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY), but not other peptides in an operant conflict test.
Heilig M; McLeod S; Koob GK; Britton KT
Regul Pept; 1992 Sep; 41(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 1360689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced sensitivity to reward in CB1 knockout mice.
Sanchis-Segura C; Cline BH; Marsicano G; Lutz B; Spanagel R
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 15083252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Behavioral effects of several new anxiolytics and putative anxiolytics.
Young R; Urbancic A; Emrey TA; Hall PC; Metcalf G
Eur J Pharmacol; 1987 Nov; 143(3):361-71. PubMed ID: 2891554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
