These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31286888)

  • 1. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.
    Guo R; Wang YJ; Liu M; Ge J; Zhang LY; Ma L; Huang WY; Zhai HH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 31286888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
    Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.
    Zhou W; Yao L; Wu H; Zheng B; Hu S; Zhang L; Li X; He C; Wang Z; Li Y; Huang C; Guo M; Zhang X; Zhu Q; Wu L; Deng Y; Zhang J; Tan W; Li C; Zhang C; Gong R; Du H; Zhou J; Sharma P; Yu H
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Nov; 3(11):e697-e706. PubMed ID: 34538736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of reporting segmental bowel preparation scores during colonoscopy in clinical practice.
    Jain D; Momeni M; Krishnaiah M; Anand S; Singhal S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(13):3994-9. PubMed ID: 25852286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer Withdrawal Time Is More Important than Excellent Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy of Adequate Bowel Preparation.
    Choi JM; Seo JY; Lee J; Han YM; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Apr; 66(4):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 32419115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of missed lesions in patients with inadequate bowel preparation through a very early repeat colonoscopy.
    Pantaleón Sánchez M; Gimeno Garcia AZ; Bernad Cabredo B; García-Rodríguez A; Frago S; Nogales O; Diez Redondo P; Puig I; Romero Mascarell C; Romero Sánchez-Miguel I; Caballero N; Ibañez I; Hernandez Negrín D; Bujedo Sadornill G; Pérez Oltra A; Pérez Berbegal R; Casals G; Seoane Urgorri A; Riu Pons F; Amorós J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Sep; 34(6):1176-1184. PubMed ID: 35189669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of oral simethicone on the adenoma detection rate and other quality indicators of screening colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded clinical trial.
    Moraveji S; Casner N; Bashashati M; Garcia C; Dwivedi A; Zuckerman MJ; Carrion A; Ladd AM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jul; 90(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 30926430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy after suboptimal bowel preparation in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program.
    Baile-Maxía S; Mangas-Sanjuan C; Medina-Prado L; Martínez-Sempere J; Murcia O; Ruíz-Gómez F; Casellas JA; Zapater P; Jover R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1093-1100. PubMed ID: 32583393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
    Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).
    Walter B; Klare P; Strehle K; Aschenbeck J; Ludwig L; Dikopoulos N; Mayr M; Neu B; Hann A; Mayer B; Meining A; von Delius S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):506-513.e4. PubMed ID: 30138612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates.
    Araujo JL; Jaiswal P; Ragunathan K; Arroyo-Mercado FM; Chawla GS; Li C; Kazmi W; Le A; Gupta N; Chokshi T; Klinger CA; Salim S; Mirza RM; Grossman E; Vignesh S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33611689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A low-volume polyethylene glycol solution was associated with an increased suboptimal bowel preparation rate but had similar recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, and adenoma detection rates.
    Hankins SC; Brimhall BB; Kankanala V; Austin GL
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176265. PubMed ID: 28448598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?
    Enestvedt BK; Brian Fennerty M; Zaman A; Eisen GM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Oct; 34(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 21848798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Korean experience of the use of Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research.
    Kim EJ; Park YI; Kim YS; Park WW; Kwon SO; Park KS; Kwak CH; Kim JN; Moon JS
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2014; 20(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 25038207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of oral simethicone on the quality of colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Cao RR; Wang L; Gao C; Pan JH; Yoshida EM; Li HY; Qi XS
    J Dig Dis; 2022 Mar; 23(3):134-148. PubMed ID: 35075814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and tolerability of high and low-volume bowel preparation compared: A real-life single-blinded large-population study.
    Occhipinti V; Soriani P; Bagolini F; Milani V; Rondonotti E; Annunziata ML; Cavallaro F; Vavassori S; Vecchi M; Pastorelli L; Tontini GE
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Dec; 13(12):659-672. PubMed ID: 35070027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection.
    Cadoni S; Falt P; Sanna S; Argiolas M; Fanari V; Gallittu P; Liggi M; Mura D; Porcedda ML; Smajstrla V; Erriu M; Leung FW
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(7):2068-75. PubMed ID: 26846118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.
    Clark BT; Laine L
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 27060426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.