These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31286897)

  • 1. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Mei L; Wei J; Yan X; Zhang X; Zheng W; Li Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31286897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fleming PS; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S92-103. PubMed ID: 23540642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Direct versus Indirect Bonding Technique on the Failure Rate of Mandibular Fixed Retainer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ahmed A; Fida M; Habib S; Javed F; Ali US
    Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 34629308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fleming PS; Johal A; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 22748994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive precoated bracket systems and operator coated bracket systems: Is there any difference?
    Alakttash AM; Fawzi M; Bearn D
    Angle Orthod; 2019 May; 89(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 30556748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dos Santos AL; Wambier LM; Wambier DS; Moreira KM; Imparato JC; Chibinski AC
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e746-e755. PubMed ID: 36158772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.
    Bozelli JV; Bigliazzi R; Barbosa HA; Ortolani CL; Bertoz FA; Faltin Junior K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):51-7. PubMed ID: 24351150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques.
    Koo BC; Chung CH; Vanarsdall RL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 10474109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets.
    Yi GK; Dunn WJ; Taloumis LJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Nov; 124(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 14614426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial.
    Czolgosz I; Cattaneo PM; Cornelis MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 32780096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arnold S; Koletsi D; Patcas R; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():13-24. PubMed ID: 27546466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Indirect Bonding Technique.
    Murakami T; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Hoshijima M; Komori H; Fujisawa A; Kamioka H
    Acta Med Okayama; 2016 Oct; 70(5):413-416. PubMed ID: 27777438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques.
    Aguirre MJ; King GJ; Waldron JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Oct; 82(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 6760721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D Printing Pen: A Novel Adjunct for Indirect Bonding.
    Kulkarni NB; Goyal SM; Shah VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):964-968. PubMed ID: 34753853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Papageorgiou SN; Konstantinidis I; Papadopoulou K; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):350-63. PubMed ID: 24062378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longer treatment times with self-ligated orthodontic brackets.
    O'Brien K
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):92. PubMed ID: 25343400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial.
    Menini A; Cozzani M; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Cozzani P; Gandini P
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):70. PubMed ID: 25547461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct and indirect bonding techniques in orthodontics: a systematic review.
    Patano A; Inchingolo AD; Malcangi G; Garibaldi M; De Leonardis N; Campanelli M; Palumbo I; Benagiano S; Bordea IR; Minetti E; Palermo A; Inchingolo F; Dipalma G; Inchingolo AM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8039-8054. PubMed ID: 37750633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.
    Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.