180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31288006)
1. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy and direct surgery in IB2/IIA2 cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.
Ouyang P; Cai J; Gui L; Liu S; Wu NY; Wang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 32221709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.
Vázquez-Vicente D; Boria F; Castellanos T; Gutierrez M; Chacon E; Manzour N; Minguez JA; Martin-Calvo N; Alcazar JL; Chiva L;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Feb; 34(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 38669163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study.
Bizzarri N; Querleu D; Dostálek L; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Giannarelli D; Lopez A; Salehi S; Ayhan A; Kim SH; Ortiz DI; Klat J; Landoni F; Pareja R; Manchanda R; Kosťun J; Ramirez PT; Meydanli MM; Odetto D; Laky R; Zapardiel I; Weinberger V; Dos Reis R; Pedone Anchora L; Amaro K; Akilli H; Abu-Rustum NR; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Javůrková V; Mom CH; Scambia G; Falconer H; Cibula D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):428.e1-428.e12. PubMed ID: 37336255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of survival outcome of open, total laparoscopic, and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.
Yoon HJ; Kwon BS; Rho HJ; Lee TH; Jeong DH; Kim KH; Suh DS; Song YJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(10):e37426. PubMed ID: 38457577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim B
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):e9. PubMed ID: 37857564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.
Plante M; Kwon JS; Ferguson S; Samouëlian V; Ferron G; Maulard A; de Kroon C; Van Driel W; Tidy J; Williamson K; Mahner S; Kommoss S; Goffin F; Tamussino K; Eyjólfsdóttir B; Kim JW; Gleeson N; Brotto L; Tu D; Shepherd LE; ;
N Engl J Med; 2024 Feb; 390(9):819-829. PubMed ID: 38416430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longer waiting times for early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy are associated with diminished long-term overall survival.
Nanthamongkolkul K; Hanprasertpong J
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 26404122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy as monotherapy in patients with recurrent intermediate/high-risk factors following radical hysterectomy for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Dong B; Zhou SF
BMC Womens Health; 2024 May; 24(1):297. PubMed ID: 38762459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges and perspectives on less invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a critical analysis of the SHAPE trial and its implications.
Takekuma M
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 35(2):e48. PubMed ID: 38499045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Song YL; Li RZ; Feng BJ; Lu YH; Wang LF; Wang ZY; Pei KG; Sun LF; Li R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108240. PubMed ID: 38457858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Wolf J; Wu Y; Hayek J; Zhang Q; Alagkiozidis I
Curr Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):2836-2845. PubMed ID: 38785496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.
Walker JL; Piedmonte MR; Spirtos NM; Eisenkop SM; Schlaerth JB; Mannel RS; Spiegel G; Barakat R; Pearl ML; Sharma SK
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Nov; 27(32):5331-6. PubMed ID: 19805679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SUrgical Access and Pattern of Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: The SUPeR Study, a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.
Puppo A; Migliaretti G; Landoni F; Uccella S; Camanni M; Ceccaroni M; Delpiano EM; Mantovani G; Roviglione G; Bianchi T; Grassi T; Maggi V; Garzon S; Galli L; Calandra V; Olearo E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):321-329. PubMed ID: 38301845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Robledo KP; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Ribeiro R; Lopez A; Yan X; Isla D; Moretti R; Bernardini MQ; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Coleman RL; Obermair A
J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; ():JCO2302335. PubMed ID: 38810208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
Baeten I; Hoogendam JP; Schreuder H; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Verheijen R; Zweemer RP; Gerestein CG
BJOG; 2021 Feb; 128(3):563-571. PubMed ID: 32627934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of changes in treatment practice on survival for cervical cancer: results from a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada.
Kang YJ; O'Connell DL; Lotocki R; Kliewer EV; Goldsbury DE; Demers AA; Canfell K
BMC Cancer; 2015 Sep; 15():642. PubMed ID: 26394749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in neuroendocrine cervical cancer: a SEER-database analysis.
Zeng F; Guo P; Xia M; He M
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 150(5):236. PubMed ID: 38710946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is minimally invasive surgical approach a reasonable option in apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer restaging? Results from a multicentric retrospective study.
Mokarram Dorri N; Del M; Cannone F; Lefebvre M; Loaec C; Sabiani L; Jauffret C; Blache G; Houvenaeghel G; Carcopino X; Classe JM; Narducci F; Martinez A; Lambaudie E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 50(3):107976. PubMed ID: 38354484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
