These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

882 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31288006)

  • 21. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
    Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic value of ABO blood group in patients with early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection.
    Hanprasertpong J; Jiamset I; Atjimakul T
    Tumour Biol; 2016 Jun; 37(6):7421-30. PubMed ID: 26678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
    Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radical surgery with individualized postoperative radiation for stage IB cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes and severe complications.
    Sandadi S; Tanner EJ; Khoury-Collado F; Kostolias A; Makker V; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Alektiar KM; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Mar; 23(3):553-8. PubMed ID: 23392402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
    Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
    Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Should the results of the LACC trial modify French practices for the choice of surgical approach for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer ? The point of view of the CNGOF Cancer Commission].
    Canlorbe G; Levêque J; Koskas M
    Bull Cancer; 2019 Oct; 106(10):843-846. PubMed ID: 31445672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
    Hoogendam JP; Verheijen RH; Wegner I; Zweemer RP
    BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 24735243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk of metachronous ovarian cancer after ovarian conservation in young women with stage I cervical cancer.
    Matsuo K; Machida H; Horowitz MP; Shahzad MMK; Guntupalli SR; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):580.e1-580.e10. PubMed ID: 28666700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Eoh KJ; Li LY; Shin W; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():140-145. PubMed ID: 32891319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.