284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31288167)
21. Time for gender mainstreaming in editorial policies.
Heidari S; Eckert MJ; Kippax S; Karim QA; Sow PS; Wainberg MA
J Int AIDS Soc; 2011 Mar; 14():11. PubMed ID: 21385405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Don't be rejected, how can we help authors, reviewers and editors?: Report of a Symposium for Editors Publishers and Others with an Interest in Scientific Publication, Held in Boston on Wednesday, 11 March 2015, during the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research.
Eaton KA; Innes N; Balaji SM; Pugh C; Honkala E; Lynch CD
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():77-85. PubMed ID: 27894948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Increasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network.
Moher D; Ravaud P
BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):154. PubMed ID: 27719671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving the quality of papers submitted to dental journals: Transcription of session for editors, associate editors, publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing held at IADR meeting in Cape Town on Wednesday, 25 June 2014.
Eaton KA; Giannobile WV; Sourgen DL; Balaji SM; Honkala E; Lynch CD
J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):855-64. PubMed ID: 25748020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.
Shamseer L; Moher D; Maduekwe O; Turner L; Barbour V; Burch R; Clark J; Galipeau J; Roberts J; Shea BJ
BMC Med; 2017 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 28298236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Findings From the INANE Survey on Student Papers Submitted to Nursing Journals.
Kennedy MS; Newland JA; Owens JK
J Prof Nurs; 2017; 33(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28577810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.
Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J; Bhar RH; Mehlman CT
J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):279-298. PubMed ID: 31016681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.
Polenakovic M; Danevska L
Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):11-31. PubMed ID: 22286612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Journal editors: How do their editing incomes compare?
Lee JCL; Watt J; Kelsall D; Straus S
F1000Res; 2020; 9():1027. PubMed ID: 33537124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Journal Publishing: A Review of the Basics.
Kennedy MS
Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):361-371. PubMed ID: 30266551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Publishing integrity and good practices in editing in biomedicine.
Polenakovic M; Gucev Z
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):11-6. PubMed ID: 25711216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Macedonian Association of Medical Editors Initiatives to Advance the Integrity of Science and Publishing.
Donev D
Acta Inform Med; 2021 Sep; 29(3):224-230. PubMed ID: 34759464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
Ferris LE; Winker MA
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28694719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.
Shen C; Björk BC
BMC Med; 2015 Oct; 13():230. PubMed ID: 26423063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing.
Lipworth WL; Kerridge IH; Carter SM; Little M
Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1056-63. PubMed ID: 21388730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
