These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31288983)
1. A data-driven, meaningful, easy to interpret, standardised accelerometer outcome variable for global surveillance. Rowlands AV; Sherar LB; Fairclough SJ; Yates T; Edwardson CL; Harrington DM; Davies MJ; Munir F; Khunti K; Stiles VH J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 31288983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cut-point-free accelerometer metrics to assess children's physical activity: An example using the school day. Fairclough SJ; Rowlands AV; Taylor S; Boddy LM Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Jan; 30(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 31593604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activity Intensity, Volume, and Norms: Utility and Interpretation of Accelerometer Metrics. Rowlands AV; Fairclough SJ; Yates T; Edwardson CL; Davies M; Munir F; Khunti K; Stiles VH Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2019 Nov; 51(11):2410-2422. PubMed ID: 31318713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing 24 h physical activity profiles: Office workers, women with a history of gestational diabetes and people with chronic disease condition(s). Dawkins NP; Yates T; Edwardson CL; Maylor B; Davies MJ; Dunstan D; Highton PJ; Herring LY; Khunti K; Rowlands AV J Sports Sci; 2021 Jan; 39(2):219-226. PubMed ID: 33459582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents. Fairclough SJ; Rowlands AV; Del Pozo Cruz B; Crotti M; Foweather L; Graves LEF; Hurter L; Jones O; MacDonald M; McCann DA; Miller C; Noonan RJ; Owen MB; Rudd JR; Taylor SL; Tyler R; Boddy LM Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2023 Mar; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 36964597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults. Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Rowlands AV; Henriksson P; Shiroma EJ; Acosta FM; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Plaza-Florido A; Gil-Cosano JJ; Ekelund U; van Hees VT; Ortega FB Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18235. PubMed ID: 31796778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile. Rowlands AV; Edwardson CL; Davies MJ; Khunti K; Harrington DM; Yates T Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jun; 50(6):1323-1332. PubMed ID: 29360664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A standardised approach to quantifying activity in domestic dogs. Karimjee K; Harron RCM; Piercy RJ; Daley MA R Soc Open Sci; 2024 Jul; 11(7):240119. PubMed ID: 39021771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normative wrist-worn accelerometer values for self-paced walking and running: a walk in the park. Dawkins NP; Yates T; Soczawa-Stronczyk AA; Bocian M; Edwardson CL; Maylor B; Davies MJ; Khunti K; Rowlands AV J Sports Sci; 2022 Jan; 40(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 34544319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization. Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Tudor-Locke C; Löf M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Molina-Garcia P; Mora-Gonzalez J; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Garcia-Marmol E; Ekelund U; Ortega FB Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter? Rowlands AV; Yates T; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 27183118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer. Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children. Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]