These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31289016)

  • 1. Preclinical evaluation of a thin-strut bioresorbable scaffold (ArterioSorb): acute-phase invasive imaging assessment and hemodynamic implication.
    Katagiri Y; Torii R; Takahashi K; Tenekecioglu E; Asano T; Chichareon P; Tomaniak M; Piek JJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Bullett N; Ahmed N; Al-Lamee K; Al-Lamee R; Leclerc G; Kitslaar P; Dijkstra J; Reiber JHC; Poon EKW; Bourantas CV; Gijsen FJH; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    EuroIntervention; 2020 Jun; 16(2):e141-e146. PubMed ID: 31289016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-implantation shear stress assessment: an emerging tool for differentiation of bioresorbable scaffolds.
    Tenekecioglu E; Torii R; Katagiri Y; Chichareon P; Asano T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi K; Modolo R; Al-Lamee R; Al-Lamee K; Colet C; Reiber JHC; Pekkan K; van Geuns R; Bourantas CV; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):409-418. PubMed ID: 30426299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic analysis of a novel bioresorbable scaffold in porcine coronary artery model.
    Tenekecioglu E; Torii R; Bourantas CV; Cavalcante R; Sotomi Y; Zeng Y; Collet C; Crake T; Abizaid A; Onuma Y; Su S; Santoso T; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 May; 91(6):1084-1091. PubMed ID: 28843033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference in haemodynamic microenvironment in vessels scaffolded with Absorb BVS and Mirage BRMS: insights from a preclinical endothelial shear stress study.
    Tenekecioglu E; Torii R; Bourantas C; Sotomi Y; Cavalcante R; Zeng Y; Collet C; Crake T; Suwannasom P; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Dec; 13(11):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 28590249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
    Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strut protrusion and shape impact on endothelial shear stress: insights from pre-clinical study comparing Mirage and Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds.
    Tenekecioglu E; Sotomi Y; Torii R; Bourantas C; Miyazaki Y; Collet C; Crake T; Su S; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 28365819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
    Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology of overlapping everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: the potential implications for clinical practice.
    Farooq V; Serruys PW; Heo JH; Gogas BD; Onuma Y; Perkins LE; Diletti R; Radu MD; Räber L; Bourantas CV; Zhang Y; van Remortel E; Pawar R; Rapoza RJ; Powers JC; van Beusekom HM; Garcìa-Garcìa HM; Virmani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 6(5):523-32. PubMed ID: 23702016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endothelial shear stress and vascular remodeling in bioresorbable scaffold and metallic stent.
    Tenekecioglu E; Katagiri Y; Takahashi K; Tomaniak M; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iñiguez A; Johannes van der Schaaf R; Dominici M; Boven AJV; Helqvist S; Sabaté M; Baumbach A; Piek JJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Kitslaar P; Dijkstra J; Reiber JHC; Chevalier B; Ural D; Pekkan K; Bourantas CV; Gijsen F; Onuma Y; Torii R; Serruys PW
    Atherosclerosis; 2020 Nov; 312():79-89. PubMed ID: 32979635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the lumen gain after treatment with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold?
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Suwannasom P; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Cavalcante R; Jonker H; Dijkstra J; Foin N; Koon JN; Collet C; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Stone GW; Popma JJ; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e998-e1008. PubMed ID: 27721215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.
    Shen L; Wu Y; Ge L; Zhang Y; Wang Q; Qian J; Qiu Z; Ge J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 28639098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial.
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Dijkstra J; Miyazaki Y; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Popma JJ; de Winter RJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 28158421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold in Porcine Coronary Artery at 6 Months.
    Zheng JF; Qiu H; Tian Y; Hu XY; Luo T; Wu C; Tian Y; Tang Y; Song LF; Li L; Xu L; Xu B; Gao RL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(3):245-255. PubMed ID: 30732729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the hemodynamic characteristics of Absorb BVS in a porcine coronary artery model.
    Tenekecioglu E; Torii R; Bourantas C; Abdelghani M; Cavalcante R; Sotomi Y; Crake T; Su S; Santoso T; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():467-473. PubMed ID: 27839816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up.
    Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Ishibashi Y; Grundeken MJ; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Suwannasom P; Regar E; Radu MD; Räber L; Bezerra H; Costa MA; Fitzgerald P; Prati F; Costa RA; Dijkstra J; Kimura T; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Akasaka T; Di Mario C; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Dec; 12(12):1498-1509. PubMed ID: 26448577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of three drug eluting stents with different platforms but with the same biodegradable polymer and the drug based on quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography at 12-month follow-up.
    Gil RJ; Bil J; Legutko J; Pawłowski T; Gil KE; Dudek D; Costa RA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 34(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 28965166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-Term Arterial Remodeling After Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation 4-Year Follow-up of Quantitative Coronary Angiography, Histology and Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Chen D; Dong Z; Xi Y; Chen C; Zhang S; Zeng S; Bi Y; Wu T; Xiao J
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Dec; 11(6):636-645. PubMed ID: 33108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.
    Tenekecioglu E; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Costa R; Chamié D; Sotomi Y; Yu TB; Abizaid A; Liew HB; Santoso T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(11):1115-1130. PubMed ID: 28527768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
    Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.