These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31289243)

  • 1. [Automated Driving Cuts the Future].
    Kamata M
    Brain Nerve; 2019 Jul; 71(7):695-704. PubMed ID: 31289243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver-centred vehicle automation: using network analysis for agent-based modelling of the driver in highly automated driving systems.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1442-1452. PubMed ID: 26912405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.
    Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment selection in human-automation interaction studies: The Failure-GAM
    Grane C
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():182-192. PubMed ID: 28865841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study.
    Banks VA; Eriksson A; O'Donoghue J; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():138-145. PubMed ID: 29409628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully Automated Driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery.
    Payre W; Cestac J; Delhomme P
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 26646299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated?
    Carsten O; Lai FC; Barnard Y; Jamson AH; Merat N
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):747-61. PubMed ID: 23156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving.
    Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Neukum A; Wolter S; Steiger R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():147-162. PubMed ID: 28886450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():389-95. PubMed ID: 26141907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DriveID: safety innovation through individuation.
    Sawyer B; Teo G; Mouloua M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4273-8. PubMed ID: 22317376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.