These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31290016)

  • 1. The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception.
    Spapé M; Harjunen V; Ahmed I; Jacucci G; Ravaja N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1259-1272. PubMed ID: 31290016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. I'll make you an offer you can refuse: How socially sensitive is the MFN?
    Spapé MM; Dundas K
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 15(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 31617454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
    Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Fan C; Wang H; Liu D; Sun J; Han F; He W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; 201():112360. PubMed ID: 38735630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The meaning of the virtual Midas touch: an ERP study in economic decision making.
    Spapé MM; Hoggan EE; Jacucci G; Ravaja N
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Mar; 52(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 25265874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adult-like neuroelectrical response to inequity in children: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; Kassab AP; Romero RL; Minati L; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 26079157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial identity and emotional expression as predictors during economic decisions.
    Alguacil S; Madrid E; Espín AM; Ruz M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):315-329. PubMed ID: 27905082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
    Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of a real face: Differences between affective faces and emojis in neural processing and their social influence on decision-making.
    Weiß M; Mussel P; Hewig J
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 15(3):255-268. PubMed ID: 31581887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Emotional Intelligence on the Impression of Irony Created by the Mismatch between Verbal and Nonverbal Cues.
    Jacob H; Kreifelts B; Nizielski S; Schütz A; Wildgruber D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163211. PubMed ID: 27716831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.