These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31290660)

  • 1. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3584-3599. PubMed ID: 31290660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Practical Perspective: The Effect of Ligand Conformers on the Negative Image-Based Screening.
    Ahinko M; Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 31174295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(4):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 35133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ligand binding mode prediction by docking: mdm2/mdmx inhibitors as a case study.
    Bharatham N; Bharatham K; Shelat AA; Bashford D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Feb; 54(2):648-59. PubMed ID: 24358984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of Shape Similarity in Pose Selection and Virtual Screening in CSARdock2014 Exercise.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):965-73. PubMed ID: 26247231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.
    Jokinen EM; Niemeläinen M; Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Lätti S; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT; Niinivehmas SP
    Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Building shape-focused pharmacophore models for effective docking screening.
    Moyano-Gómez P; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Cheminform; 2024 Aug; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 39123240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of virtual high-throughput screening methods for the identification of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
    Niinivehmas SP; Virtanen SI; Lehtonen JV; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1353-63. PubMed ID: 21591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LEADS-FRAG: A Benchmark Data Set for Assessment of Fragment Docking Performance.
    Chachulski L; Windshügel B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6544-6554. PubMed ID: 33289563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PeptoGrid-Rescoring Function for AutoDock Vina to Identify New Bioactive Molecules from Short Peptide Libraries.
    Zalevsky AO; Zlobin AS; Gedzun VR; Reshetnikov RV; Lovat ML; Malyshev AV; Doronin II; Babkin GA; Golovin AV
    Molecules; 2019 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 30642123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.