These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31291136)

  • 1. Mixed-polarity random-dot stereograms alter GABA and Glx concentration in the early visual cortex.
    Rideaux R; Goncalves NR; Welchman AE
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):888-896. PubMed ID: 31291136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mixed-polarity benefit of stereopsis arises in early visual cortex.
    Schaeffner LF; Welchman AE
    J Vis; 2019 Feb; 19(2):9. PubMed ID: 30779843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation to Binocular Anticorrelation Results in Increased Neural Excitability.
    Rideaux R; Michael E; Welchman AE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 31560264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Poggio GF; Motter BC; Squatrito S; Trotter Y
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 4024459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No balance between glutamate+glutamine and GABA+ in visual or motor cortices of the human brain: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.
    Rideaux R
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118191. PubMed ID: 34023450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing Motion-In-Depth Perception of Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Zhang D; Nourrit V; De Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):722-734. PubMed ID: 29914316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GABA and Glx predict EEG responses of visual sensitivity in autism.
    Sapey-Triomphe LA; Puts NAJ; Costa TL; Wagemans J
    Autism Res; 2024 May; 17(5):917-922. PubMed ID: 38576253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultra-High-Field Neuroimaging Reveals Fine-Scale Processing for 3D Perception.
    Ng AKT; Jia K; Goncalves NR; Zamboni E; Kemper VG; Goebel R; Welchman AE; Kourtzi Z
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(40):8362-8374. PubMed ID: 34413206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in neural complexity during the perception of 3D images using random dot stereograms.
    Burgess AP; Rehman J; Williams JD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Apr; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 12694899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth.
    Hayashi R; Miyawaki Y; Maeda T; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2773-82. PubMed ID: 14568094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal Dynamics of GABA and Glx in the Visual Cortex.
    Rideaux R
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32571964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain activation difference evoked by different binocular disparities of stereograms: An fMRI study.
    Wang F; Yang W; Zhang L; Gundran A; Zhu X; Liu J; Li X; Bao S; Gao S
    Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1308-1313. PubMed ID: 27453205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pattern and depth discrimination from random dot stereograms.
    Harwerth RS; Rawlings SC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1975 Apr; 52(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 1130488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
    Zhaoping L
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychophysics of stereopsis can be explained without invoking independent ON and OFF channels.
    Read JCA; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2019 Jun; 19(6):7. PubMed ID: 31173632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.