149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31291852)
1. Comparison of survival rate and risk of revision for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
Lacko M; Schreierová D
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2019 Aug; 30(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 31291852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
Gothesen O; Lygre SHL; Lorimer M; Graves S; Furnes O
Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):649-656. PubMed ID: 28929828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population.
Castagnini F; Sudanese A; Bordini B; Tassinari E; Stea S; Toni A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3368-3372. PubMed ID: 28655567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2009.
Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin L; Petursson G; Lygre S; Ellison P; Hallan G; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2013 May; 95-B(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 23632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies.
van der Voort P; Pijls BG; Nouta KA; Valstar ER; Jacobs WC; Nelissen RG
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1209-16. PubMed ID: 23997134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Major Aseptic Revision Following Total Knee Replacement: A Study of 478,081 Total Knee Replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Jorgensen NB; McAuliffe M; Orschulok T; Lorimer MF; de Steiger R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 30801369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Ake CF; Wang C; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.
Neufeld ME; Albers A; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Masri BA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1713-1718. PubMed ID: 29398257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survivorship of fixed vs mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sixty-four studies and National Joint Registries.
Abu Al-Rub Z; Lamb JN; West RM; Yang X; Hu Y; Pandit HG
Knee; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 33010783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does pre-coating total knee tibial implants affect the risk of aseptic revision?
Bini SA; Chen Y; Khatod M; Paxton EW
Bone Joint J; 2013 Mar; 95-B(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 23450022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. P.F.C Sigma
Riaz O; Aqil A; Sisodia G; Chakrabarty G
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1145-1149. PubMed ID: 28210821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Choe JW; Kim HJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):866-73. PubMed ID: 22617913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.
Puijk R; Sierevelt IN; Pijls BGCW; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Nolte PA
Acta Orthop; 2023 Dec; 94():600-606. PubMed ID: 38093649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rotating platform versus fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up.
Martin JR; Beahrs TR; Fehring KA; Trousdale RT
Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1055-1058. PubMed ID: 27815014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKA.
Mahoney OM; Kinsey TL; D'Errico TJ; Shen J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 22006197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Mobile- and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties in the Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 1,861 Patients.
Huang F; Wu D; Chang J; Zhang C; Qin K; Liao F; Yin Z
J Knee Surg; 2021 Mar; 34(4):434-443. PubMed ID: 31569258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcome in an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: a 15- to 18-year survivorship analysis.
Melton JT; Mayahi R; Baxter SE; Facek M; Glezos C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1067-70. PubMed ID: 22844047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Fransen BL; van Duijvenbode DC; Hoozemans MJM; Burger BJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1757-1777. PubMed ID: 27324479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.
Hernigou P; Huys M; Pariat J; Roubineau F; Flouzat Lachaniette CH; Dubory A
Int Orthop; 2018 Feb; 42(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 28667383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Matched Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
Mohammad HR; Judge A; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Dec; 103(24):2270-2280. PubMed ID: 34543254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
