221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31292817)
61. Duration of blastulation may be associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles.
Mumusoglu S; Ozbek IY; Sokmensuer LK; Polat M; Bozdag G; Papanikolaou E; Yarali H
Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Dec; 35(6):633-639. PubMed ID: 28958703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.
Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Yoruk GDA; Candurmaz NN; Coetzee K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):629-636. PubMed ID: 30617927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. High gonadotropin dosage does not affect euploidy and pregnancy rates in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
Barash OO; Hinckley MD; Rosenbluth EM; Ivani KA; Weckstein LN
Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 29040519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Can the combination of time-lapse parameters and clinical features predict embryonic ploidy status or implantation?
Zou Y; Pan Y; Ge N; Xu Y; Gu R; Li Z; Fu J; Gao J; Sun X; Sun Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Oct; 45(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35918244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Morphokinetic parameters from a time-lapse monitoring system cannot accurately predict the ploidy of embryos.
Zhang J; Tao W; Liu H; Yu G; Li M; Ma S; Wu K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Sep; 34(9):1173-1178. PubMed ID: 28676910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts?
Irani M; Zaninovic N; Rosenwaks Z; Xu K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):379.e1-379.e7. PubMed ID: 30521800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The use of voting ensembles to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to predict embryo ploidy status.
Jiang VS; Kandula H; Thirumalaraju P; Kanakasabapathy MK; Cherouveim P; Souter I; Dimitriadis I; Bormann CL; Shafiee H
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Feb; 40(2):301-308. PubMed ID: 36640251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Cleavage Stage Human Embryos-Impact on Infertility Outcome.
Podolak A; Liss J; Kiewisz J; Pukszta S; Cybulska C; Rychlowski M; Lukaszuk A; Jakiel G; Lukaszuk K
Curr Issues Mol Biol; 2022 Jan; 44(1):273-287. PubMed ID: 35723399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications.
Rubio C; Rienzi L; Navarro-Sánchez L; Cimadomo D; García-Pascual CM; Albricci L; Soscia D; Valbuena D; Capalbo A; Ubaldi F; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2019 Sep; 112(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 31200971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.
Capalbo A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Biricik A; Baldi M; Colamaria S; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Fiorentino F
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 23148203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. High frequency of DNA ploidy abnormalities in preimplantation embryos of the rabbit.
Schumacher A; Fischer B; Agorastos T; Beier HM
Mol Reprod Dev; 1993 Jun; 35(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8318218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.
Chawla M; Fakih M; Shunnar A; Bayram A; Hellani A; Perumal V; Divakaran J; Budak E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jan; 32(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25395178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Oocyte meiotic spindle morphology is a predictive marker of blastocyst ploidy-a prospective cohort study.
Tilia L; Chapman M; Kilani S; Cooke S; Venetis C
Fertil Steril; 2020 Jan; 113(1):105-113.e1. PubMed ID: 31739977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development.
Milewski R; Kuć P; Kuczyńska A; Stankiewicz B; Łukaszuk K; Kuczyński W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Apr; 32(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 25690157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening.
Demko ZP; Simon AL; McCoy RC; Petrov DA; Rabinowitz M
Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1307-1313. PubMed ID: 26868992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development.
Rubio C; Rodrigo L; Mercader A; Mateu E; Buendía P; Pehlivan T; Viloria T; De los Santos MJ; Simón C; Remohí J; Pellicer A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Aug; 27(8):748-56. PubMed ID: 17546708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Impact of polar body biopsy on embryo morphokinetics-back to the roots in preimplantation genetic testing?
Schenk M; Groselj-Strele A; Eberhard K; Feldmeier E; Kastelic D; Cerk S; Weiss G
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1521-1528. PubMed ID: 29790071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A time to look back: analysis of morphokinetic characteristics of human embryo development.
Herrero J; Tejera A; Albert C; Vidal C; de los Santos MJ; Meseguer M
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1602-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 24083877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
Kirkegaard K; Sundvall L; Erlandsen M; Hindkjær JJ; Knudsen UB; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.
Kaing A; Kroener LL; Tassin R; Li M; Liu L; Buyalos R; Hubert G; Shamonki M
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jan; 35(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 28894983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
