140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31292860)
1. Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note.
Rigdon EE; Becker JM; Sarstedt M
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):772-780. PubMed ID: 31292860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Perspective on the Mathematical and Psychometric Aspects of Factor Indeterminacy.
Nicewander WA
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):825-838. PubMed ID: 31709826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Problems with Rationales for Parceling that Fail to Consider Parcel-Allocation Variability.
Sterba SK
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):264-287. PubMed ID: 30755036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous parceling strategies when latent variables represent multidimensional constructs.
Cole DA; Perkins CE; Zelkowitz RL
Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 26323000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factor Indeterminacy as Metrological Uncertainty: Implications for Advancing Psychological Measurement.
Rigdon EE; Becker JM; Sarstedt M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 30829544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clustered Common Factor Exploration in Factor Analysis.
Uno K; Adachi K; Trendafilov NT
Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1048-1067. PubMed ID: 30847650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some Mathematical Properties of the Matrix Decomposition Solution in Factor Analysis.
Adachi K; Trendafilov NT
Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):407-424. PubMed ID: 29243118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations.
Sellbom M; Tellegen A
Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1428-1441. PubMed ID: 31120298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accounting for Parcel-Allocation Variability in Practice: Combining Sources of Uncertainty and Choosing the Number of Allocations.
Sterba SK; Rights JD
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):296-313. PubMed ID: 27054282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
Rhemtulla M
Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design.
Keller MC; Coventry WL
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 8(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 15989748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computing and evaluating factor scores.
Grice JW
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):430-50. PubMed ID: 11778682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of parceling on model selection: Parcel-allocation variability in model ranking.
Sterba SK; Rights JD
Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):47-68. PubMed ID: 27045852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 26523435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.
Little TD; Rhemtulla M; Gibson K; Schoemann AM
Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 23834418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical laboratory medicine measurements correlation analysis under uncertainty.
Aslam M
Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 58(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 33730870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors.
Jeon M; Rijmen F; Rabe-Hesketh S
Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):785-808. PubMed ID: 30120699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
Demars CE
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
