157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31292942)
1. Sequence-dependent sensitivity explains the accuracy of decisions when cues are separated with a gap.
Tohidi-Moghaddam M; Zabbah S; Olianezhad F; Ebrahimpour R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2745-2754. PubMed ID: 31292942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them.
Kiani R; Churchland AK; Shadlen MN
J Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 33(42):16483-9. PubMed ID: 24133253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A unified bayesian observer analysis for set size and cueing effects on perceptual decisions and saccades.
Shimozaki SS; Schoonveld WA; Eckstein MP
J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task.
Mulder MJ; Keuken MC; van Maanen L; Boekel W; Forstmann BU; Wagenmakers EJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):1048-58. PubMed ID: 23572205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Two-Stage Process Model of Sensory Discrimination: An Alternative to Drift-Diffusion.
Sun P; Landy MS
J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(44):11259-11274. PubMed ID: 27807167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.
van den Brink RL; Murphy PR; Desender K; de Ru N; Nieuwenhuis S
J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):130-143. PubMed ID: 33172980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson's disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions.
Huang YT; Georgiev D; Foltynie T; Limousin P; Speekenbrink M; Jahanshahi M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():577-87. PubMed ID: 26184442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociating neural variability related to stimulus quality and response times in perceptual decision-making.
Bode S; Bennett D; Sewell DK; Paton B; Egan GF; Smith PL; Murawski C
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():190-200. PubMed ID: 29408524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual Evidence Accumulation Guides Decision-Making in Unrestrained Mice.
Odoemene O; Pisupati S; Nguyen H; Churchland AK
J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(47):10143-10155. PubMed ID: 30322902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal policy for uncertainty estimation concurrent with decision making.
Li X; Su R; Chen Y; Yang T
Cell Rep; 2023 Mar; 42(3):112232. PubMed ID: 36924497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation?
Seibold VC; Bausenhart KM; Rolke B; Ulrich R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 21440239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction.
Shankar S; Kayser AS
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2088-2103. PubMed ID: 28250149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task.
Liu T; Pleskac TJ
J Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 106(5):2383-98. PubMed ID: 21849612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence against perfect integration of sensory information during perceptual decision making.
Carland MA; Marcos E; Thura D; Cisek P
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 115(2):915-30. PubMed ID: 26609110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategic and Dynamic Temporal Weighting for Perceptual Decisions in Humans and Macaques.
Levi AJ; Yates JL; Huk AC; Katz LN
eNeuro; 2018; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 30406190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The temporal impulse response underlying saccadic decisions.
Ludwig CJ; Gilchrist ID; McSorley E; Baddeley RJ
J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 25(43):9907-12. PubMed ID: 16251438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating between Models of Perceptual Decision Making Using Pupil Size Inferred Confidence.
Kawaguchi K; Clery S; Pourriahi P; Seillier L; Haefner RM; Nienborg H
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(41):8874-8888. PubMed ID: 30171092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stochastic resonance enhances the rate of evidence accumulation during combined brain stimulation and perceptual decision-making.
van der Groen O; Tang MF; Wenderoth N; Mattingley JB
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1006301. PubMed ID: 30020922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention facilitates initiation of perceptual decision making: a combined psychophysical and electroencephalography study.
Ueno T; Kumano H; Uka T
Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jul; 242(7):1721-1730. PubMed ID: 38816552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanisms underlying the influence of saliency on value-based decisions.
Chen X; Mihalas S; Niebur E; Stuphorn V
J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):18. PubMed ID: 24167161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]