These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31294696)

  • 1. The Impact of Respondent-Interviewer Familiarity and Repeated Survey Participation on Abortion Reporting: Evidence from Rajasthan, India.
    Bell SO; Bishai D
    Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Dec; 44(4):147-156. PubMed ID: 31294696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between interviewer-respondent familiarity and family planning outcomes in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a repeat cross-sectional analysis.
    Anglewicz P; Akilimali P; Eitmann LP; Hernandez J; Kayembe P
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e023069. PubMed ID: 30670510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.
    Footman K
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e047570. PubMed ID: 34799361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can you repeat the question? Paradata as a lens to understand respondent experience answering cognitively demanding, sensitive questions.
    Bell SO; Bishai D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252512. PubMed ID: 34097702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social network-based measurement of abortion incidence: promising findings from population-based surveys in Nigeria, Cote d'Ivoire, and Rajasthan, India.
    Bell SO; Shankar M; Omoluabi E; Khanna A; Andoh HK; OlaOlorun F; Ahmad D; Guiella G; Ahmed S; Moreau C
    Popul Health Metr; 2020 Oct; 18(1):28. PubMed ID: 33076922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depends Who's Asking: Interviewer Effects in Demographic and Health Surveys Abortion Data.
    Leone T; Sochas L; Coast E
    Demography; 2021 Feb; 58(1):31-50. PubMed ID: 33834247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test of the stranger-interviewer norm in the Dominican Republic.
    Sana M; Stecklov G; Weinreb AA
    Popul Stud (Camb); 2016; 70(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 26988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strangers in the Field: A Methodological Experiment on Interviewer-Respondent Familiarity.
    Weinreb A; Sana M; Stecklov G
    Bull Methodol Sociol; 2018; 137-138(1):94-119. PubMed ID: 37502739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation into expectation-led interviewer effects in health surveys.
    Clarke P; Sproston K; Thomas R
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 May; 56(10):2221-8. PubMed ID: 12697210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interviewer effects in public health surveys.
    Davis RE; Couper MP; Janz NK; Caldwell CH; Resnicow K
    Health Educ Res; 2010 Feb; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 19762354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study.
    Rookus MA; van Leeuwen FE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Dec; 88(23):1759-64. PubMed ID: 8944006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitive questions in surveys.
    Tourangeau R; Yan T
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):859-83. PubMed ID: 17723033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?
    Bell SO; Bishai D
    Stud Fam Plann; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30675727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interviewers' and respondents' effects on self-reported alcohol consumption in a Swiss health survey.
    Heeb JL; Gmel G
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Jul; 62(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 11513221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of induced abortion: an analysis of individual, household and contextual factors in Rajasthan, India.
    Elul B
    J Biosoc Sci; 2011 Jan; 43(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 20831847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interviewer effects when investigating abuse were not compatible with effect modification but instead with confounding.
    Fraga S; Lucas R; Costa D; Barros H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):911-8. PubMed ID: 23651764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the underestimation of induced abortions in a survey of the general population in France.
    Houzard S; Bajos N; Warszwawski J; de Guibert-Lantoine C; Kaminski M; Leridon H; Lelong N; Ducot B; Hassoun D; Ferrand M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Mar; 5(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 10836663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of unit nonresponse in multi-mode data collection: A multilevel analysis.
    Berete F; Van der Heyden J; Demarest S; Charafeddine R; Gisle L; Braekman E; Tafforeau J; Molenberghs G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215652. PubMed ID: 31026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion care in Haiti: A secondary analysis of demographic and health data.
    Meffen K; Burkhardt G; Bartels S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206967. PubMed ID: 30408133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives.
    Finer LB; Frohwirth LF; Dauphinee LA; Singh S; Moore AM
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2005 Sep; 37(3):110-8. PubMed ID: 16150658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.