233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3129556)
1. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences.
Nicoll PM; Narayan KV; Paterson JG
Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 May; 49(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1917453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
Mak DB; Straton JA
Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
Meadows P
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An audit of a cervical smear screening programme.
Moodie PJ; Kljakovic M; McLeod DK
N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):374-6. PubMed ID: 2797554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Problems of cervical cancer screening programmes.
Rang EH; Tod ED
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jun; 38(311):267-9. PubMed ID: 3255814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
Yu CK; Rymer J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing the uptake of cervical smears: strategies implemented among general practitioners in Auckland.
White GE; McAvoy BR; Gleisner S
N Z Med J; 1993 Aug; 106(962):357-60. PubMed ID: 8255562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A family practice residency cervical screening project: perceived screening barriers.
Branoff R; Santi K; Campbell JK; Roetzheim R; Oler M
Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 9048173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
